The Unseen Crisis: Formula 1’s Battle for Relevance in a Shifting World

A discreet, yet highly significant, gathering took place last week in Japan. The ten team principals of Formula 1 convened for an unscheduled meeting, notably without the presence of representatives from Formula One Management (FOM) or the sport’s governing body, the FIA. While team bosses certainly have the right to meet at their discretion, the clandestine nature of this particular summit, held at the rear entrance of a hospitality unit, signaled something deeper than routine discussions. It marked the first such collective meeting since Liberty Media acquired FOM two years prior, and, by many accounts, the first since the Formula One Teams Association (FOTA) disbanded in 2014, hinting at a growing apprehension within the sport’s core.

The convener of this secretive assembly was widely believed to be Mercedes, with various sources indicating that Mercedes Motorsport CEO Toto Wolff initiated the call. The level of secrecy was such that attendees were reportedly asked to use a “tradesmen’s entrance” to avoid drawing attention. One team principal, upholding the code of silence, flatly refused to comment to the media, stating, “I gave my word in the meeting not to talk to the media.” This unified front underscored the gravity of the issues being discussed.

Whispers from the Summit: Declining Income and Viewer Engagement

While an official agenda was never released, sources willing to speak off the record shed light on the pressing topics. One insider suggested the primary focus was “How to improve (spice up) the show,” acknowledging a perceived lack of excitement in recent seasons. Another source was more direct, revealing that a recent and significant drop in income, coupled with dwindling viewer numbers, had served as a “wake-up call for us all.” This financial downturn stems from a combination of reduced TV revenues, lower race hosting fees, and decreased ‘other’ income streams, predominantly from hospitality sales and trackside advertising.

Paradoxically, this decline comes despite Liberty Media’s substantial investments in marketing. The sport has seen a massively ramped-up marketing spend, a refreshed logo, and the launch of a supposedly sophisticated F1 TV Pro internet streaming service. Yet, these efforts have not translated into sustained growth. In fact, some initiatives, like a “snazzy app” that cut down live timing screens, actually infuriated die-hard fans, highlighting a disconnect between Liberty’s strategy and the desires of its core audience. For the third quarter of 2018, teams were projected to share approximately 4% less in revenue – a concerning trend that shows no sign of abating.

The Alarming Decline in F1 Television Ratings

The financial woes are inextricably linked to a disturbing drop in television ratings. Across the first ten rounds of the season, the total hours of F1 broadcast fell by roughly a quarter year-on-year, from 23,000 to 18,500. This significant reduction is largely attributed to the loss of key broadcast partners, including Sky Germany/Austria and F1 Latin America. A particularly worrying (though unconfirmed) year-on-year comparison for the Russian Grand Prix indicated a TV ratings slump of over 20% compared to the previous year.

Liberty Media reportedly attributes this specific decline to a later slot in the year. However, this argument lacks weight, as the championship battle between Lewis Hamilton and Sebastian Vettel was considerably closer heading into Sochi than it is currently, suggesting that competitive drama alone isn’t enough to counteract broader trends. The latest Nielsen Sports broadcast report, shared with RaceFans by global motorsport vice-president Nigel Geach, showed a one percent cumulative year-on-year decline in TV audiences over the first ten rounds. While a single percentage point might not seem catastrophic, for Liberty Media, which fundamentally positions itself as a media company tasked with growing the sport, even a slight decline is a red flag. Furthermore, the faltering launch of F1 TV Pro, Liberty’s much-touted over-the-top (OTT) streaming service, remains a significant concern. F1 CEO Chase Carey himself admitted at a Vanity Fair summit that the service had “more glitches than we hoped for,” adding, “For us, it’s early days…”, an admission that did little to reassure an already skeptical fan base.

The Brazilian Grand Prix Payment Fiasco: A Legacy of Neglect

Adding to the confluence of concerns, news surfaced regarding the upcoming Brazilian Grand Prix, which brought more unwelcome developments. Teams will not receive payment for their participation in the 2018, 2019, or even the 2020 Brazilian races. This shocking revelation highlights a fundamental flaw in the commercial agreements surrounding the sport.

The race agreement for the Brazilian Grand Prix reportedly comprised two distinct parts: a hosting contract with the promoter, a long-standing associate of former F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone (whose wife once served as marketing director for the company), and a separate financial underwriting agreement with the city/state of Sao Paulo. Historically, public coffers covered the hosting fee, with gate receipts then covering the promoter’s costs and profits.

It appears that during the final days of Bernie Ecclestone’s tenure, he extended the promoter agreement but conspicuously failed, or conveniently forgot, to secure the necessary fiscal agreement with the local government. The promoter insists he holds a valid deal and argues that if F1 fails to sort out the funding, it is not his responsibility. This leaves the teams and FOM in an unenviable position, traveling thousands of miles to stage a high-cost spectacle for three consecutive years without any direct financial return for their efforts. As one insider commented, “That’s the short version, but you’re not far off the truth,” adding, “We were all surprised when we saw the contract, but Mr E was the boss at the time…” The irony is stark: one can scarcely imagine Ecclestone allowing his show to travel 6000 miles across the Pacific without payment, yet Liberty Media appears willing to do precisely that.

Team Jitters and Liberty’s Mounting Pressure

Against this backdrop of financial uncertainty and operational glitches, it’s hardly surprising that Formula 1 teams are growing increasingly uneasy about the sport’s direction under Liberty Media. There are already indications that influential figures like Mercedes’ Toto Wolff, Renault’s Cyril Abiteboul, and Red Bull’s Christian Horner are advocating for a reduced race calendar, or, alternatively, increased revenues coupled with less stringent budget caps if the calendar is to exceed 20 races. These demands place even greater pressure on Liberty Media to not only stabilize but aggressively grow F1’s appeal and financial health.

This raises a critical question: Is achieving Liberty Media’s stated objective within its power, or are external forces conspiring against its ambitions? More pointedly, has interest in global motorsport peaked? Are we witnessing “Peak F1”?

Beyond F1: The Broader Crisis of “Peak Motorsport”

Formula 1 is far from alone in experiencing a downturn in interest. Other major motorsport series, particularly in the United States, are facing similar challenges. NASCAR and IndyCar, both deeply ingrained in American culture, are grappling with dwindling attendances and declining TV ratings. NASCAR, for example, has seen drops of between 20 and 30 percent for some races, with FOX Sports’ viewership reportedly down 29 percent compared to 2016. What’s even more alarming is the demographic shift: the average age of NASCAR viewers has surged by nine years to 58 in just 12 years, placing it among the oldest viewership brackets, behind only golf and tennis. This starkly indicates the series’ failure to attract younger audiences, as Millennials and Gen Z are simply not inheriting their parents’ passion for traditional motorsport. The image of sitting in bleacher stands at an oval track is perceived as increasingly ‘uncool’ by these generations.

This shift in interest extends to how young people consume entertainment. Streaming services like Netflix now frequently trump traditional linear television for the attention of younger demographics, further eroding motorsport viewership. Consequently, sponsors are withdrawing their support, and where replacements are found, their funding levels are significantly lower. When long-standing sponsors like supermarket giant Target end a 27-year partnership with Chip Ganassi’s IndyCar team, or DIY chain Lowe’s exits Hendrick Motorsport after 17 seasons with a seven-time champion, it signifies a profound and worrying disconnect within the sport’s commercial ecosystem.

The “Peak Licence” Phenomenon: Changing Automotive Culture

Just as discussions revolve around “Peak Car” – especially in urban areas serviced by ride-sharing platforms like Uber – so too is there increasing talk of “Peak Licence.” US statistics clearly illustrate how future generations are shying away from personal automobiles and, by extension, motorsport. In 1983, 46 percent of American 16-year-olds held driver’s licenses; thirty years later, that figure had halved and continues to fall. Concurrently, the average annual distance traveled by car is also declining. While not all license holders are “petrol-heads,” and vice-versa, this trend serves as a powerful benchmark, pointing to a broader waning interest in motoring and, consequently, motorsport. If there is no correlation, then motorsport must be facing a series of unfortunate, yet precisely timed, coincidences, which seems highly improbable.

A paper published by phys.org in January found similar worrying trends in the United Kingdom. Driver’s licenses among 17-20-year-olds peaked at 48 percent in 1992/94 and 75 percent for 21-29-year-olds. Two decades later, these figures had plummeted to 29 percent and 63 percent respectively. Between 2010 and 2014, only 37 percent of 17-29-year-olds reported driving a car during a typical week, compared to 46 percent in 1995-99. These statistics paint a clear picture: younger generations are increasingly less engaged with car ownership and driving, directly impacting the foundational interest that traditionally fed motorsport.

The Rise of Formula E and the Future of Automotive Marketing

When considering how these societal shifts relate to Formula 1, the picture becomes clearer. While the slide in TV ratings over the past six years can be partly attributed to F1’s controversial switch to pay-TV, the underlying issue is the public’s increasing reluctance to pay for F1 broadcasts. This suggests a demographic of “convenience customers” rather than the “die-hard fans” that Liberty professes to target. Furthermore, a clear correlation exists between the rise in pay-TV models and the subsequent drop-off in sponsor interest.

The modern lifestyle, characterized by internet shopping, budget airlines, virtual social interaction, and ride-hailing apps, means that personal car ownership is no longer the necessity it once was. As interest in the automobile wanes, F1 inevitably feels the impact. Moreover, Millennials are far more likely to associate with “electric green” initiatives than with the roar of a V8 engine or even a hybrid powertrain. This fundamental shift explains why motor manufacturers are increasingly flocking towards Formula E.

In the mid-2000s, Formula 1 proudly boasted seven major motor manufacturers, each spending hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Today, the sport has only three and a half (with Honda primarily an engine supplier), while Formula E now attracts eight manufacturers, operating on roughly a tenth of F1’s budgets. This stark contrast highlights a significant paradigm shift in how automotive brands perceive the value and relevance of motorsport. Traditionally, manufacturers funded motorsport through a combination of R&D and marketing budgets. Now, facing two diametrically opposite choices – fossil fuel versus electric – it stands to reason that budgets are being split, reducing the funds available for F1 or even deterring potential new entries.

With car companies devoting increasing time and resources to autonomous vehicle development, both R&D and marketing budgets are under renewed pressure to contribute to these future-focused endeavors. This further decreases the amount available for any form of motorsport. It’s a self-reinforcing spiral: less interest in cars leads to less interest in racing, which leads to less manufacturer funding, further diminishing the sport’s appeal.

Once, F1’s powerful slogans proclaimed “Win on Sunday, sell on Monday” and “Racing improves the breed.” Today, F1 cars and the racing itself are so far removed from real-world road car technology that such slogans no longer resonate. If anything, Formula E’s technology, including its treaded tires and advanced energy storage systems, holds greater road relevance than anything F1 currently offers – all at a fraction of the cost. Consider the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance, which recently surpassed the VW Group as the number one motor manufacturer globally, despite Renault only recently re-entering F1 with limited success. Nissan, meanwhile, is embarking on its maiden Formula E season. Both Renault and Nissan are market leaders in their respective electric car segments, while Mitsubishi leads in plug-in hybrids. Apart from the newly resurrected Alpine, these giants lack a true performance brand, relying on volume brands like Dacia, Lada, and Datsun with zero motorsport pretensions. Yet, performance-oriented brands like Audi, Porsche, and BMW, which steer clear of F1, have all committed to Formula E.

The Future is Digital: Shifting Marketing Focus

Another telling indicator of this rapidly shifting landscape can be seen in the evolution of marketing and major events. For the past three years, F1’s pre-season testing in Barcelona has clashed with the Mobile World Congress (MWC), held in the city’s Fira halls. Over eight days of testing, the circuit considers itself fortunate if total attendance reaches ten thousand, even with free entry for race weekend pass holders. Yet, the concurrent MWC regularly draws over 100,000 tech enthusiasts. This disparity clearly illustrates where future buying power and attention lie. Similarly, the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas annually attracts as many visitors as the Indianapolis 500, an event that proudly brands itself as the world’s largest single-day sporting spectacle. Significantly, brands like VW and Renault now allocate more resources to their CES exhibits than to traditional mainstream motor shows, which have gradually lost their luster. Indeed, major players like VW, Ferrari, and Fiat conspicuously shunned the Paris Motor Show recently, underscoring the shift in marketing priorities.

A Call for Reinvention, Not Just “Spicing Up”

All these factors collectively point to rapidly shifting landscapes for motoring and motorsport in general, and Formula 1 in particular. The pressures confronting F1 are fundamentally external, not of its own making. Yet, they are very real, and the monumental challenge for the sport and Liberty Media is to adapt faster than these landscapes shift. As is always the case in the high-stakes world of F1, if you are not moving forward at an accelerated pace, you are inevitably falling backwards.

If Formula 1, along with series like NASCAR and IndyCar, fails to undergo radical adaptation, it risks fading into irrelevance before succumbing to a slow demise. Liberty Media and the teams need to do far more than simply “spice up the show.” They must fundamentally reinvent the sport, from its race formats and technological ethos to its governance structures, fan experience, and broadcasting strategies. This monumental undertaking requires massive, unwavering commitment and, above all, an enormous collective will from all stakeholders, extending far beyond impromptu, secretive gatherings. The dinosaur lacked that crucial characteristic, and its fate serves as a stark warning.

RacingLines

• The year of sprints, ‘the show’ – and rising stock: A political review of the 2021 F1 season
• The problems of perception the FIA must address after the Abu Dhabi row
• Why the budget cap could be F1’s next battleground between Mercedes and Red Bull
• Todt defied expectations as president – now he plans to “disappear” from FIA
• Sir Frank Williams: A personal appreciation of a true racer

Browse all RacingLines columns