In the high-octane world of Formula 1, where dominance often appears absolute, moments of unexpected vulnerability can captivate the entire paddock. Mid-September 2015 saw Mercedes arrive in Singapore, fresh off a streak of ten victories in twelve rounds, showcasing a level of supremacy rarely witnessed. Yet, in the steamy, nocturnal embrace of the Marina Bay circuit, their untouchable pace mysteriously vanished. Neither Lewis Hamilton nor Nico Rosberg managed to qualify within the front two rows, and come race day, only Rosberg salvaged a fourth-place finish, a distant 24 seconds behind winner Sebastian Vettel. Mercedes, baffled by this inexplicable blip, resumed their two-car dominion at Suzuka as if nothing had transpired.
Fast forward eight years, and an even more perplexing scenario unfolded in Singapore, this time for Red Bull Racing. Their RB19, a car on track to etch its name into the annals of history as arguably the most dominant ever, had arrived at its fifteenth Grand Prix unbeaten. A machine of unparalleled performance, the RB19 seemed destined to conquer every challenge thrown its way in the 2023 season. However, in a stunning turn of events that echoed Mercedes’ 2015 enigma, both Max Verstappen and Sergio Perez were eliminated in Q2 of qualifying, performing like midfield contenders rather than the architects of a record-breaking winning streak.
The shockwaves reverberated through the paddock. Red Bull team principal Christian Horner, visibly perplexed, admitted, “We tried a new aero part in practice, but what we went into qualifying with is tried and tested. For whatever reason, the car just hasn’t responded at this circuit.” This unexpected downturn transformed the landscape of the Singapore Grand Prix, injecting a rare dose of unpredictability into a season previously defined by Red Bull’s relentless march to victory. The question on everyone’s lips: what caused the reigning champions to falter so dramatically?
Advert | Become a Supporter & go ad-free
Ferrari Seizes the Moment: Sainz Secures Back-to-Back Pole Positions
In stark contrast to Red Bull’s struggles, Ferrari found an unexpected surge of form. Just two weeks prior, the high-speed Monza circuit was considered ideally suited for their SF-23, yet it was at the tight, high-downforce Marina Bay track – a circuit many expected to challenge the Scuderia – that Carlos Sainz Jnr delivered a sensational performance, securing his second consecutive pole position. The Spaniard himself expressed his surprise, acknowledging the team’s significant progress.
“I’m pleasantly surprised,” Sainz confessed after his impressive qualifying run. “Because at our last high-downforce track, we’ve really struggled. We haven’t been on the pace. We’ve done a lot of work to try and understand our high-downforce package, and the team has done a very good job to put it together for Singapore. I think it’s a good job well done.” This newfound synergy with their high-downforce setup signaled a critical step forward for Ferrari, hinting at a potential shift in their season’s trajectory.
Sainz’s pole position, while well-earned, wasn’t without a touch of fortune. During the thrilling final laps of Q3, as cars navigated Marina Bay’s newly configured straight approaching Turn 16, Sainz was initially a tenth of a second slower than his Ferrari teammate, Charles Leclerc. However, a small error from Leclerc exiting Turn 17 saw him lose crucial traction and momentum, bleeding time all the way to the finish line. This momentary lapse allowed both Sainz and George Russell to narrowly edge ahead of the Monegasque driver, with Sainz ultimately claiming pole and Russell securing a crucial front-row start.
Leclerc, ever the candid competitor, acknowledged his mistake. “A small mistake in Turn 17 which cost me too much, but apart from that I’m happy with the lap,” he stated, though adding, “It wasn’t enough today, though.” Despite the disappointment of missing out on pole, Ferrari’s collective performance underscored their potential to challenge at the very front.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Mercedes Emerges as a Formidable Challenger
George Russell’s clean and precise qualifying lap was rewarded with his first front-row appearance since the Australian Grand Prix at the start of April. After revealing a change in his qualifying approach following a string of disappointing results before the summer break, Russell has consistently delivered, securing his third consecutive top-four grid position since the season resumed. Mercedes had entered the weekend with quiet confidence, expecting to be in the fight for pole, and Russell’s performance validated that belief.
“We know that on the high-downforce circuits we tend to go better. So this is a great opportunity, this weekend, to get a victory,” Russell articulated, subtly highlighting the immense stakes of the Singapore Grand Prix. The Red Bull stumble presented an open goal for both Mercedes and Ferrari, offering the best chance all season to break the champions’ unprecedented winning streak. The critical question remains: which team will seize this golden opportunity to claim a rare victory in 2023?
Analyzing Race Pace and Strategic Opportunities
Based on Friday’s long-run data under the Singapore lights, a tight battle between the Ferraris and Russell’s Mercedes is anticipated. On medium compound tires, Lewis Hamilton displayed the fastest pace during high-fuel runs, averaging a 1’38.3 over an eight-lap stint. Carlos Sainz was just over a tenth of a second per lap slower, with Russell exhibiting nearly identical pace to the pole-sitter. Charles Leclerc lagged by approximately three-tenths of a second per lap compared to his teammate. Notably, Lando Norris in the McLaren was faster than all four, but his runs in second practice were conducted on the softer compound tires, making a direct comparison challenging.
Despite Mercedes’ promising pace, team principal Toto Wolff remained characteristically cautious, refraining from declaring his team outright race-win contenders. “I would never, after such a season, because we are in the front row, call ourselves the favourite,” Wolff asserted, emphasizing the need for humility. “I think we need to be humble about the situation. The result genuinely came as a surprise that we are P2 and P5, but fighting for a win is a different story.” This prudent approach highlights the unpredictable nature of street circuits like Marina Bay and Mercedes’ awareness of Ferrari’s strong qualifying form.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Ferrari’s Defensive Posture and Red Bull’s Uncharacteristic Pessimism
Historically, Ferrari has struggled with race pace relative to its rivals throughout the season. Carlos Sainz, despite starting from pole at Monza in the previous round, was eventually overtaken by both Red Bulls. This pattern has bred caution within the Ferrari camp, with Sainz expressing uncertainty about their race day performance in Singapore.
“I really have no idea how we’re going to be,” Sainz admitted. “Looking at long-run data from Friday, the Mercedes, the Aston Martins, and the Red Bull did look a bit quicker than us in tire degradation and race pace, so it could be that tomorrow we have to run, yet again, a bit of a defensive race. I don’t discount that even around this track we could hold on to a P1 because it’s a lot more difficult to pass than other tracks this season. But our race pace still looks like our weakest point.” This insight suggests Ferrari will prioritize managing tires and defending track position, rather than launching an all-out offensive.
Conversely, Red Bull, a team synonymous with superior race pace, found themselves in an unprecedented predicament. The champions’ struggles in Singapore were confirmed to be more than superficial. Max Verstappen, usually an unstoppable force when battling through the field, sounded unusually pessimistic about his prospects of climbing to the front on Sunday. “Normally our car is always a bit better on degradation, maybe to some people around us, but I don’t think that matters a lot in Singapore where it’s very hard to pass,” Verstappen explained. “You need to be one-and-a-half, two, three seconds faster, which clearly we are not. Also, now with the car performance and balance we have, it will be a very tough, long afternoon.” His remarks underscore the severity of Red Bull’s performance deficit on this unique circuit.
Despite starting with nine cars separating him from Verstappen, Carlos Sainz maintained a wary respect for the formidable Red Bull pairing. “I don’t think you can ever discount Max and Red Bull,” Sainz stated. “They might turn up tomorrow with a race pace that they’ve had there all season, and still manage somehow to make through the field. But, for sure, around here, they have a much more difficult task.” This acknowledgment reflects the deep-seated respect for Red Bull’s championship-winning capabilities, even in their moments of weakness.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Strategic Gambit: Mercedes’ Tire Advantage and Pirelli’s Forecast
Mercedes believes they possess a crucial strategic advantage: an extra unused set of medium tires. This hidden ace could significantly broaden their strategy options during a race renowned for its high probability of Safety Car interventions or red flags – arguably the highest on the calendar. Russell highlighted the potential impact of this tactical flexibility. “I think it’s going to be very close between a one and a two-stop,” Russell explained. “With our mediums, we can put Ferrari in a difficult position and try and force them into an error and get the upper hand. So that’s what we’re looking for.”
However, Pirelli’s head of motorsport, Mario Isola, offered a slightly different perspective on the likely pit strategy. “I believe it’s a one-stop, to be honest,” Isola stated. “Because when you lose 27, 28 seconds in the pit lane, it’s difficult to recover this time on track.” Pirelli anticipates that teams will generally avoid the soft tire for the race start, with the majority of drivers opting for mediums before a single stop for hard tires, projected to occur around lap 20, roughly one-third into the race. This scenario, of course, hinges on a dry track. While earlier forecasts suggested a significant risk of rain, the probability has diminished to a mere 20% for the start of the Grand Prix, indicating a likely dry and clear evening of racing.
The Ultimate Test of Skill and Endurance
Even with a slightly shortened track layout, the Singapore Grand Prix remains the longest race of the Formula 1 season, presenting an unparalleled physical and mental challenge to the drivers. The humid conditions, the relentless twists and turns, and the constant concentration required under the artificial lights push competitors to their absolute limits. For perhaps the only time in the 2023 season, the outcome of the race is genuinely unknown, creating an atmosphere of palpable anticipation. Whoever emerges victorious will have earned it through immense dedication, strategic brilliance, and sheer endurance.
Pole-winner Carlos Sainz perfectly encapsulated the formidable task ahead: “I think it will be a tough race to manage, a tough race to put together. But I think if we nail it, we have a great opportunity. And that’s the target tomorrow, of course.” The stage is set for a thrilling and potentially historic Singapore Grand Prix, where the usual order has been disrupted, and a new victor seems poised to emerge.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Qualifying Times in Full: Singapore Grand Prix 2023
| Position | Number | Driver | Team | Q1 time | Q2 time (vs Q1) | Q3 time (vs Q2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | Ferrari | 1’32.339 | 1’31.439 (-0.900s) | 1’30.984 (-0.455s) |
| 2 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 1’32.331 | 1’31.743 (-0.588s) | 1’31.056 (-0.687s) |
| 3 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1’32.406 | 1’32.012 (-0.394s) | 1’31.063 (-0.949s) |
| 4 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren-Mercedes | 1’32.483 | 1’31.951 (-0.532s) | 1’31.270 (-0.681s) |
| 5 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | 1’32.651 | 1’32.019 (-0.632s) | 1’31.485 (-0.534s) |
| 6 | 20 | Kevin Magnussen | Haas-Ferrari | 1’32.242 | 1’31.892 (-0.350s) | 1’31.575 (-0.317s) |
| 7 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin-Mercedes | 1’32.584 | 1’31.835 (-0.749s) | 1’31.615 (-0.220s) |
| 8 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Alpine-Renault | 1’32.369 | 1’32.089 (-0.280s) | 1’31.673 (-0.416s) |
| 9 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Haas-Ferrari | 1’32.100 | 1’31.994 (-0.106s) | 1’31.808 (-0.186s) |
| 10 | 40 | Liam Lawson | AlphaTauri-Honda RBPT | 1’32.215 | 1’32.166 (-0.049s) | 1’32.268 (+0.102s) |
| 11 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull-Honda RBPT | 1’32.398 | 1’32.173 (-0.225s) | Missed by 0.007s |
| 12 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine-Renault | 1’32.452 | 1’32.274 (-0.178s) | Missed by 0.108s |
| 13 | 11 | Sergio Perez | Red Bull-Honda RBPT | 1’32.099 | 1’32.310 (+0.211s) | Missed by 0.144s |
| 14 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams-Mercedes | 1’32.668 | 1’33.719 (+1.051s) | Missed by 1.553s |
| 15 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | AlphaTauri-Honda RBPT | 1’31.991 | ||
| 16 | 77 | Valtteri Bottas | Alfa Romeo-Ferrari | 1’32.809 | Missed by 0.141s | |
| 17 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren-Mercedes | 1’32.902 | Missed by 0.234s | |
| 18 | 2 | Logan Sargeant”>Logan Sargeant | Williams-Mercedes | 1’33.252 | Missed by 0.584s | |
| 19 | 24 | Zhou Guanyu | Alfa Romeo-Ferrari | 1’33.258 | Missed by 0.590s | |
| 20 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin-Mercedes | 1’33.397 | Missed by 0.729s |
Sector Times: A Detailed Breakdown of Qualifying Performance
| Position | Number | Driver | Sector one | Sector two | Sector three | Ultimate lap | Deficit to ultimate lap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | 26.717 (1) | 38.477 (3) | 25.768 (1) | 1’30.962 | 0.022 |
| 2 | 63 | George Russell | 26.785 (4) | 38.406 (1) | 25.865 (3) | 1’31.056 | – |
| 3 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | 26.754 (2) | 38.428 (2) | 25.881 (4) | 1’31.063 | – |
| 4 | 4 | Lando Norris | 26.756 (3) | 38.666 (7) | 25.848 (2) | 1’31.270 | – |
| 5 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | 26.915 (5) | 38.628 (6) | 25.909 (5) | 1’31.452 | 0.163 |
| 6 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | 26.924 (6) | 38.599 (4) | 25.962 (6) | 1’31.485 | – |
| 7 | 20 | Kevin Magnussen | 26.959 (8) | 38.606 (5) | 26.01 (8) | 1’31.575 | – |
| 8 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | 26.986 (9) | 38.703 (8) | 25.984 (7) | 1’31.673 | – |
| 9 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | 26.926 (7) | 38.738 (10) | 26.144 (12) | 1’31.808 | – |
| 10 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | 27.177 (14) | 38.747 (11) | 26.067 (11) | 1’31.991 | – |
| 11 | 11 | Sergio Perez | 27.042 (10) | 38.814 (12) | 26.195 (14) | 1’32.051 | 0.048 |
| 12 | 1 | Max Verstappen | 27.144 (12) | 38.896 (13) | 26.022 (9) | 1’32.062 | 0.111 |
| 13 | 40 | Liam Lawson | 27.285 (18) | 38.716 (9) | 26.145 (13) | 1’32.146 | 0.020 |
| 14 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | 27.178 (15) | 39.003 (14) | 26.022 (9) | 1’32.203 | 0.071 |
| 15 | 23 | Alexander Albon | 27.131 (11) | 39.309 (17) | 26.214 (15) | 1’32.654 | 0.014 |
| 16 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | 27.161 (13) | 39.293 (16) | 26.242 (16) | 1’32.696 | 0.206 |
| 17 | 77 | Valtteri Bottas | 27.239 (16) | 39.211 (15) | 26.359 (17) | 1’32.809 | – |
| 18 | 2 | Logan Sargeant | 27.245 (17) | 39.523 (20) | 26.466 (18) | 1’33.234 | 0.018 |
| 19 | 24 | Zhou Guanyu | 27.319 (20) | 39.339 (18) | 26.6 (20) | 1’33.258 | – |
| 20 | 18 | Lance Stroll | 27.289 (19) | 39.507 (19) | 26.518 (19) | 1’33.314 | 0.083 |
Speed Trap: Top Speeds Recorded in Qualifying
| Position | Number | Driver | Car | Engine | Model | Max kph (mph) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | Ferrari | Ferrari | SF-23 | 303.8 (188.8) |
| 2 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | Ferrari | SF-23 | 303.4 (188.5) |
| 3 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams | Mercedes | FW45 | 303.2 (188.4) |
| 4 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | Mercedes | W14 | 303.2 (188.4) |
| 5 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin | Mercedes | AMR23 | 303.1 (188.3) |
| 6 | 11 | Sergio Perez | Red Bull | Honda RBPT | RB19 | 303.0 (188.3) |
| 7 | 20 | Kevin Magnussen | Haas | Ferrari | VF-23 | 302.6 (188.0) |
| 8 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren | Mercedes | MCL60 | 302.4 (187.9) |
| 9 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull | Honda RBPT | RB19 | 302.1 (187.7) |
| 10 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Haas | Ferrari | VF-23 | 302.0 (187.7) |
| 11 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin | Mercedes | AMR23 | 301.5 (187.3) |
| 12 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren | Mercedes | MCL60 | 301.3 (187.2) |
| 13 | 2 | Logan Sargeant | Williams | Mercedes | FW45 | 301.2 (187.2) |
| 14 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | Mercedes | W14 | 300.4 (186.7) |
| 15 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Alpine | Renault | A523 | 300.2 (186.5) |
| 16 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine | Renault | A523 | 299.6 (186.2) |
| 17 | 24 | Zhou Guanyu | Alfa Romeo | Ferrari | C43 | 299.0 (185.8) |
| 18 | 40 | Liam Lawson | AlphaTauri | Honda RBPT | AT04 | 298.5 (185.5) |
| 19 | 77 | Valtteri Bottas | Alfa Romeo | Ferrari | C43 | 297.8 (185.0) |
| 20 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | AlphaTauri | Honda RBPT | AT04 | 297.2 (184.7) |
Over to You: Join the Discussion
Can Max Verstappen and Red Bull defy the odds and stage a remarkable comeback from 11th on the grid? Which team is best positioned to capitalize on Red Bull’s rare vulnerability and clinch victory at the Singapore Grand Prix?
Share your insights and predictions for the race in the comments section below!
Further Reading on the 2023 Singapore Grand Prix
- Sainz’s Singapore win made Leclerc focus on improving his race pace – Clear
- Singapore and Austin retirements cost me top 10 championship place – Ocon
- How Ocon’s “extreme” height for an F1 driver is helping other tall racers
- Steward’s admission Verstappen should have had penalty frustrates his rivals
- Drivers back Singapore qualifying tweak as rule changes again for Japanese GP
Browse all 2023 Singapore Grand Prix articles