Leclerc’s Radio Frustrations: Time for Him to Take the Helm

For the better part of six seasons, Charles Leclerc has stood as Ferrari’s undisputed lead driver, a prodigious talent whose raw speed and undeniable flair have consistently positioned him at the forefront of the Scuderia’s ambitions. Yet, this remarkable journey has been frequently punctuated by moments of intense frustration, broadcast globally via his team radio. These exasperated exchanges, often triggered by strategic blunders, indecisive team orders, or other operational miscues, have not only sparked countless memes but have also underscored a persistent tension between Leclerc’s on-track prowess and Ferrari’s sometimes perplexing decision-making.

Over this period, Ferrari has not remained static. The team has demonstrably worked to elevate its strategic capabilities and implement structural changes designed to enhance race management. While these efforts have yielded positive impacts, a closer examination of Leclerc’s radio history reveals a recurring pattern of stress points. Intriguingly, this analysis also hints at a subtle but significant adjustment Leclerc himself might consider to navigate a problem he repeatedly encounters.

The Tumultuous Ascent: Battling for Number One (2019)

When Charles Leclerc joined Ferrari in 2019, fresh from a sensational rookie season, team principal Mattia Binotto initially outlined a clear hierarchy: Leclerc, the junior driver, was expected to support his four-time world champion teammate, Sebastian Vettel. However, it took just one race for Leclerc’s blistering pace to challenge this established order, setting the stage for a dramatic internal power struggle.

2019 Australian Grand Prix: The First ‘Hold Position’

The very first race of the season in Australia saw Ferrari intervene with a “hold position” order as Leclerc rapidly closed the gap on Vettel. Despite his clear speed advantage, Leclerc dutifully complied, losing approximately 17 seconds and finishing behind his teammate in fifth. The frustration was palpable, even if understated initially.

Leclerc	Shall I stay behind Sebastian? Yes or no.
Marcos Padros	Yes. Back off to have some margin.
Leclerc	OK.
Marcos Padros	Cool down the tyres.
Leclerc	Tyres are not that warm.

Vettel, post-race, downplayed the incident, stating, “It’s not the first time that the pit wall asked to freeze the race there and make sure you bring the cars home. I don’t think this was a strong team order.” Yet, for Leclerc, it was a taste of the challenges to come.

• Ferrari ordered Leclerc to stay behind Vettel

2019 Bahrain Grand Prix: Defiance and Victory

Just one race later in Bahrain, Leclerc secured pole position. After a slow start saw him cede the lead to Vettel, he quickly recovered and began to reel in his teammate. Ferrari issued the instruction to “stay there for two laps,” but Leclerc, recognizing his superior pace, boldly ignored the order, executing a decisive pass around the outside of Turn One. This act of defiance, leading to his eventual (though bittersweet due to engine issues) victory, was a watershed moment, unequivocally demonstrating his capability and challenging the team’s initial hierarchy.

• Why Leclerc had to ignore Ferrari’s order to stay behind Vettel

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

2019 Chinese Grand Prix: Strategic Miscalculation

Leclerc, despite his recent assertiveness, showed a willingness to follow team orders when they aligned with his understanding. In Shanghai, he again allowed Vettel to pass. However, this positional swap inadvertently left him vulnerable to Max Verstappen. Red Bull capitalised swiftly during the pit stops, leapfrogging Verstappen ahead of Leclerc. This demonstrated the delicate balance of team orders and strategy, where a seemingly straightforward decision could have unintended, negative consequences for one driver.

9	Marcos Padros	Charles, Can you go faster? Can you go faster?	Lap 9, approaching turn six
9	Leclerc	[Unclear] …yet.
9	Marcos Padros	So we need to push. Push now.	Exiting turn six
9	Marcos Padros	We need to go faster otherwise we’ll let Sebastian past.	On back straight
9	Leclerc	Yeah but we are both… OK. Let’s see in two laps. But okay.
9	Marcos Padros	Copy
9	Marcos Padros	Charles, Can you go faster? Can you go faster?	Lap 9, approaching turn six
10	Marcos Padros	Let Sebastian by.	On back straight
10	Leclerc	But I’ve done it now. I’m pulling away.
10	Leclerc	I’ll let him by	Pit straight
11	Marcos Padros	Copy

• Ferrari stands by decision to swap Vettel and Leclerc

Following this, Leclerc reflected on his approach to team orders. “Obviously there will always be team orders in Formula 1,” he acknowledged. “It depends on the situation. In some situations I will.” This measured response hinted at a growing assertiveness and an analytical approach to team directives.

Further instances of driver swaps occurred in Spain, complicated by Safety Car interventions. Even then, Vettel expressed weariness with the incessant discussions surrounding Ferrari’s strategies, a sentiment that would only intensify throughout the season.

The team swapped the running order of its drivers twice during the Spanish Grand Prix as its cars finished fourth and fifth in the race. Vettel let Charles Leclerc pass him early in the race and Leclerc was told to allow Vettel past later on. Vettel remarked: “Charles was on a different strategy and with the Safety Car obviously his strategy was thrown to bits. But I think we tried to work together as much as we can but obviously every time we try to do something there’s a lot of talk afterwards which maybe doesn’t help to be a bit more reactive on the fly.”

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

In Belgium, Ferrari instructed Vettel to let Leclerc pass, given their differing strategies. Leclerc seized this opportunity to claim his maiden Grand Prix victory and Ferrari’s first win of the season, a pivotal moment in his career. He followed this with a second consecutive win at Monza, but Mattia Binotto’s post-race comments—”Oggi sei perdonato” (today you are forgiven)—hinted at underlying tensions, particularly regarding a qualifying tow incident where Leclerc benefited but Vettel did not, further highlighting the complexities of managing two drivers vying for supremacy.

• Why Binotto told Leclerc “today you are forgiven” after Monza win

2019 Singapore Grand Prix: The Infamous Undercut

The next round in Singapore brought one of the most contentious strategic calls of the season. Leclerc, leading the race comfortably for 19 laps, saw his potential third consecutive victory snatched away when Ferrari pitted Vettel before him. The ‘undercut’ allowed Vettel to emerge ahead, leaving a visibly frustrated Leclerc questioning the decision. Ferrari’s sporting director Laurent Mekies attempted to pacify him over the radio, but Leclerc’s dissatisfaction was clear.

37	Leclerc	To be completely honest with you I don’t understand at all the undercut. But whatsoever I will discuss after the race. Anyway.
37	Laurent Mekies	Charles it was the best thing we could do. Head down, the race is long. Let’s concentrate on Safety Car. You are doing a super job. Watch your tyres and head down.
37	Leclerc	Yeah my head is down and it will be down until the race. But I just want to let you know my feeling.
37	Laurent Mekies	Yeah it’s all good, Charles. You will understand after the race.
37	Leclerc	Then we can fight, right?
37	Marcos Padros	Pause Don’t risk anything. You can attack, but don’t risk anything.
37	Leclerc	Copy.

Leclerc demanded an explanation, but Binotto publicly admonished his driver, stating, “There are some things that should not be said on the radio because at the end it would not have changed our decision.” This incident highlighted a significant clash between driver emotion and team discipline, a theme that would resurface.

• Complete Ferrari Singapore 2019 team radio transcript

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

2019 Russian Grand Prix: Vettel’s Defiance and the Power Shift

In a season marked by Leclerc’s ascending performance, the Russian Grand Prix provided the clearest indication of the shift in power within Ferrari. Leclerc, on pole, had an agreement with the team to retain the lead if starts were identical. However, Vettel, starting behind, used the slipstream to pass him into Turn Two. Despite Ferrari issuing no fewer than five instructions for Vettel to yield, he refused, creating an awkward and tense situation on track and over the radio.

2	Marcos Padros	So Charles start performance was the same and we are looking to do the swap further into the race.
2	Leclerc	Yes, no problem, at least I understand.
3	Marcos Padros	Safety Car in this lap. Try to maximise full throttle and K2 on.
5	Leclerc	Gap to behind is fine now.
5	Marcos Padros	Copy, understood.
5	Marcos Padros	Sebastian will let you by next lap.
6	Marcos Padros	Lap six: Vettel leads Leclerc by 1.37 seconds and Hamilton by 4.0 seconds. Message to Leclerc on pit straight. Sebastian will let you by.
6	Leclerc	Where?
6	Marcos Padros	We’ll do it next lap.
7	Marcos Padros	Turn one. Sebastian will let you by.
7	Leclerc	When?
7	Marcos Padros	Try to close the gap and we’ll do it next lap.
7	Leclerc	You put me behind. I respected everything. We will speak later. But now it’s difficult to close the gap, obviously.
8	Marcos Padros	So he should let you by this lap, will let you by.
9	Marcos Padros	You need to try to close the gaps.
9	Leclerc	Yeah guys but I mean…
9	Laurent Mekies	Charles we will do the swap a bit later on. Lewis is a bit close and we want to push now. We will do it later. Just focus on your race. Thank you.
9	Leclerc	I completely understand. The only thing is that I respected, I gave him the slipstream, no problems. Then I tried to push at the beginning of the race but I overheated the tyre. But anyway, it’s no problems. Manage the situation.

Leclerc eventually regained position through the pit stops, but the episode undeniably cemented his status as Ferrari’s future. The season ended with Leclerc 24 points ahead of Vettel, leading to a new five-year contract and the announcement of Vettel’s departure after the 2020 season, signaling a definitive shift in the team’s focus and hierarchy.

Championship Dreams Derailed: Strategy Errors and Communication Gaps (2022-2024)

The arrival of Carlos Sainz Jnr brought a new, equally competitive teammate, but the following two seasons saw Ferrari struggle for competitiveness, diverting focus from inter-driver battles. However, 2022 marked a dramatic turnaround, with Leclerc initially leading the championship charge. This resurgence, however, quickly highlighted renewed strategic frailties within the Scuderia, which became a fresh and exasperating source of radio angst for Leclerc.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

2022 Hungarian Grand Prix: Hard Tyre Fiasco

One of the most glaring strategic missteps occurred at the Hungaroring. In an attempt to maintain Leclerc’s advantage over Verstappen, Ferrari opted for hard tyres during a crucial pit stop. This decision proved catastrophic. Leclerc struggled immensely to generate performance from the harder compound, allowing Verstappen to pass him with ease. Adding insult to injury, even after Verstappen spun and briefly fell behind, he effortlessly repassed Leclerc, exposing the severity of Ferrari’s tactical error and Leclerc’s visceral disappointment.

Lap: 40
Marcos Padros	So behind we have Perez and Verstappen, Verstappen with new medium.
Marcos Padros	Verstappen behind with DRS.
Leclerc	Verstappen passes him Fuck, the tyres are shit.
Lap: 41
Marcos Padros	Still a long race to go.
Marcos Padros	Verstappen spins and falls behind him So gap to Verstappen behind 1.2.
Lap: 42
Marcos Padros	Gap to Verstappen 1.3. And 28 laps to go.
Lap: 43
Marcos Padros	Gap to Verstappen 0.8.
Marcos Padros	Gap to Verstappen 1.0.
Marcos Padros	Verstappen behind with DRS.
Lap: 44
Marcos Padros	Gap to Verstappen 0.7.
Marcos Padros	Verstappen with DRS.
Lap: 45
Leclerc	Verstappen passes him again These tyres are shit.

• Transcript: Why Ferrari told Leclerc ‘the hard is worse than expected’ – but still used it

2022 Brazilian Grand Prix Qualifying: A Costly Split Strategy

Ferrari’s strategic inconsistencies were not exclusive to Leclerc, but he often bore the brunt of their more egregious errors. A prime example was the closing stages of qualifying at Interlagos in 2022. With rain looming, Ferrari deployed a perplexing split strategy, sending Sainz out on slick tyres while Leclerc was sent out on intermediates. This move almost guaranteed that one driver would be on the wrong compound. Leclerc, observing his rivals on slicks, quickly realized his predicament. Compounding the error, when Ferrari belatedly tried to call him in for slicks, the instruction came too late for him to reach the pit lane entrance, effectively ruining his qualifying session and underscoring a breakdown in communication and foresight.

“Where is the rain?”: How Ferrari’s “split” strategy cost Leclerc in qualifying

The profound disappointment of 2022, seeing a championship challenge dissolve into a distant second place, triggered significant management changes at Ferrari. Frederic Vasseur replaced Mattia Binotto as team principal, and among his early reforms was a comprehensive shake-up of the team’s strategy division. These changes have led to noticeable improvements in Ferrari’s individual car strategies, as evidenced by more coherent and effective race management in recent events.

• “Am I in a race here or what?”: How Ferrari aced their Suzuka strategies

Another significant personnel change occurred a year ago when Bryan Bozzi took over from Xavier Marcos Padros as Leclerc’s race engineer. Despite six years of collaboration, the communication between Leclerc and Marcos Padros frequently lacked the seamless clarity seen in other long-standing partnerships, such as Verstappen and Gianpiero Lambiase. A revealing exchange from their penultimate race together in Shanghai 2024 perfectly illustrates these ongoing communication difficulties:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

Leclerc	There is absolutely no rain for now.
Marcos Padros	Raining at turn 12, we believe.
Leclerc	Yes but not enough. Let me know.
Marcos Padros	Push, I will let you know.
Leclerc	Turn 13 [Unclear]
Marcos Padros	Box now, box now! Box, box, box!
Leclerc	Leclerc has already passed the pit lane entrance Nice. Nice one. Let me push now.

Lap: 55/56 LEC: 1’40.882
Marcos Padros	And try original line turns seven-eight for comparison.
Leclerc	What?
Marcos Padros	Try original line turn, seven and eight.
Leclerc	I don’t understand you. How is that a line? What the hell is that?
Marcos Padros	Original line – like the beginning of the race.
Marcos Padros	Slippery track reported where you are for debris, we believe right-hand side.
Leclerc	Original line, you said?
Marcos Padros	Original, yes.
Leclerc	What the hell does that mean?
Lap: 56/56 LEC: 1’40.568
Marcos Padros	Just forget it, it’s last lap.

• “You need to be more on it”: 12 unheard radio exchanges from the Chinese GP

Enduring Troubles: Inter-Driver Strategy and Teamwork Challenges

While Ferrari has made commendable strides in refining its tactical approach for individual cars, a persistent and vexing issue remains: the effective management of conflicting strategies between its two highly competitive drivers. Whether it was Leclerc and Sainz, or now Leclerc and Hamilton, the Scuderia frequently finds its drivers encountering each other on track, leading to tactical dilemmas that cost valuable time and opportunities.

2022 British Grand Prix: ‘Stop Inventing’ and Lost Time

A notable instance of this dynamic unfolded at Silverstone in 2022. While Sainz famously implored the team to “stop inventing” with their ever-changing orders, Leclerc was equally exasperated by the decision-making that saw him losing critical race time trapped behind his teammate, highlighting the team’s indecision and the ripple effects on both drivers.

17	Marcos Padros	Sainz is being told that lap time target is 32.9.
	Leclerc	Yeah, but then do something, please! I’m not… I’m not trying to influence my result. I’m just, I can go faster, guys.
	Marcos Padros	Copy, understood.
18	Marcos Padros	And K1 available.
	Leclerc	Yeah, copy.
	Marcos Padros	So Sainz is being told to push.
19	Leclerc	Yeah, copy. I try to keep my tyres but I’m just losing race time.
	Marcos Padros	Copy.
20	Marcos Padros	So Sainz will box this lap.
	Leclerc	Copy that.

Later that year in Brazil, Leclerc’s repeated calls for a car swap with Sainz were denied, with Binotto explaining, “Swapping the two cars on the last straight was certainly tricky because Charles had got Fernando [Alonso] and Max just behind. So certainly it could have been tricky and [potentially] dangerous.” This decision, while perhaps understandable in its rationale, still cost Leclerc potential points.

2023 Australian Grand Prix Qualifying: The Botched Tow

Ferrari’s attempts to orchestrate qualifying runs smoothly also stumbled in Melbourne 2023. Leclerc was promised a tow from Sainz on the main straight but instead found himself briefly held up by his teammate at the start of the lap, only to then miss out on the promised slipstream. Leclerc’s sarcastic post-session comments – “Big thanks to Carlos for the tow in turns three and four. It was nice – got a little bit of extra speed. Always nice to be close there” – perfectly captured the botched coordination and the frustration it caused.

• Why Leclerc ‘thanked’ Sainz for a tow he didn’t get after Ferrari radio mix-up

2024 Las Vegas Grand Prix: The Cost of Being ‘Nice’

The dynamic between Leclerc and Sainz was generally constructive, but their closely matched pace inevitably led to direct confrontations. In Las Vegas last year, Leclerc was left fuming after receiving contradictory messages: first told Sainz would “not overtake,” then “not put you under pressure,” only for Sainz to pass him shortly after. His raw, unguarded comments after the race, seemingly not intended for broadcast, revealed his deep-seated frustration at how his cooperative nature often seemed to work against him.

Lap 32
Bozzi	Watch the white line. Watch the white line and box, Charles, box.
Adami	Charles is boxing.
Bozzi	Carlos has been told to not overtake, but it’s really close. He might be just in front.
Bozzi	He has been told to not put you under pressure.
Adami	Do not put him under pressure.
Bozzi	Sainz passes Leclerc into turn five So just take care of your tyres. Focus on your tyres.
Leclerc	Maybe try in Spanish.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

Victory lap
Leclerc	Was that chequered flag?
Bozzi	Yes.
Bozzi	Pick up, please.
Leclerc	Yes, whatever you want, as always.
Bozzi	Charles, you did your job, okay. Thank you.
Leclerc	Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, I did my job but being nice fucks me over all the fucking time, all the fucking time. It’s not even being nice, it’s just being respectful.
Bozzi	Charles, Charles…
Leclerc	I know I need to shut up but at one point it’s always the same, so… Oh my fucking god.
Bozzi	Okay. But anyway, you did the right thing for the team.
Bozzi	And pick up please.
Leclerc	Yeah, yeah, fucking pick up what the fuck we want… Shit, shit, shit. And the radio is on. I’m sorry, that was on me.

• ‘Being nice f**** me over’: Leclerc’s radio anger and Sainz’s criticism explained

With Lewis Hamilton’s arrival, Leclerc has found himself in a familiar situation, albeit with a different teammate. In China’s sprint race qualifying, he expressed surprise at the team’s tactics when, after aborting an early flying lap, he ended up ahead of Hamilton and was told to let his teammate through, a directive he found unusual.

Bozzi	And can we swap the cars please?
Leclerc	Swap the cars now?
Bozzi	Yes, please.
Leclerc	Yeah, I’ll do it, but we’ve never done that and I’m a bit in the shit as well, so… Leclerc lets Hamilton past at the exit of turn 10

• “We’ve never done that”: Leclerc’s confusion over Hamilton position swap explained

The Grand Prix itself saw Leclerc spend several frustrating laps stuck behind Hamilton, who, despite offering to let his teammate by, took longer than the team desired to execute the swap.

Lap: 16/56 LEC: 1’55.134, HAM: 1’37.942
Bozzi	Next car is Lewis.
Bozzi	Exit turn 10 And we will swap the cars in turn 14.
Bozzi	And Lewis will let you by into turn 14.
Lap: 19/56 LEC: 1’36.907, HAM: 1’37.075
Bozzi	Exit turn 13 We will swap the cars into turn 14.
Lap: 20/56 LEC: 1’37.299, HAM: 1’37.469
Leclerc	(Unclear)
Bozzi	This is what he’s been told.
Lap: 21/56 LEC: 1’37.160, HAM: 1’39.319
Leclerc	This is a shame. The pace is there. Hamilton lets Leclerc past in turn one
Bozzi	Well done, sorry about that. Keep pushing. [State of charge] six when you want.
Bozzi	So you are the fastest car out there. Let’s go, Charles.

• Did F1’s radio editing create a false narrative Hamilton was disobeying Ferrari?

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

A strikingly similar situation unfolded at the recent Miami Grand Prix. This time, Hamilton, on softer tyres than Leclerc, spent several laps behind his teammate while Ferrari deliberated over a swap. Once positions were exchanged, Hamilton made little progress, and soon began to hold up Leclerc. Again, precious laps were lost due to the internal delay, prompting Leclerc to once more voice his profound dissatisfaction with the team’s “stupid” strategy call.

• Leclerc also criticised Ferrari over “stupid” strategy on radio

Lessons for Leclerc: The Balance of Teamwork and Self-Preservation

Ferrari has, at times, become the subject of motorsport folklore for its occasional strategic eccentricities and the proliferation of complex, multi-lettered plans. While some of this mockery has been justified, it is equally true that the team has shown a capacity to learn and evolve from its past mistakes, particularly in refining its individual car strategies under the new leadership.

Yet, it cannot have escaped Charles Leclerc’s notice that the radio conversations he had in Miami and Shanghai this year about swapping places with Hamilton mirror almost exactly those he had last year concerning Sainz. The fundamental question persists: why does Ferrari repeatedly allow its cars to cost each other valuable time? This enduring challenge is partly an unavoidable side-effect of fostering a team with two fiercely competitive drivers. McLaren, for instance, has navigated similar difficulties with Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri, a dynamic that is likely to continue.

What conclusions, then, should Leclerc draw from the latest episode in Miami? The time lost in the convoluted process of first letting Hamilton by, only to be eventually waved past him again, undoubtedly cost Leclerc the opportunity to challenge Andrea Kimi Antonelli for a potentially better finish. This pattern of internal strategy delaying his progress raises a critical question about driver psychology and assertiveness in a team environment.

Would any of Leclerc’s closest rivals willingly compromise their position in such a manner to aid a teammate? Perhaps more pertinent still, would the Charles Leclerc of late-2019 – the driver who fiercely strove to secure his place at Ferrari against a multiple-champion teammate – have allowed such prolonged tactical indecision to unfold without a more forceful intervention? The answer might lie in revisiting that early assertiveness, finding a balance between team loyalty and a necessary degree of self-preservation to fully maximize his own potential and, in turn, Ferrari’s.

Formula 1 Insights & Updates

• One of F1’s greatest races happened 15 years ago today. Or did it?
• “Overtaking is overtaking”: Domenicali denies F1’s yo-yo racing is “artificial”
• The crashes F1 is trying to prevent may be rare – but the danger is obvious
• F1 returning to India soon after 2027 sounds like wishful thinking
• Verstappen loathes F1’s new generation of cars – but what do his rivals reckon?

Browse all Formula 1 articles