In a stunning display of resurgent form, Pierre Gasly secured an impressive third place on the grid for the Las Vegas Grand Prix. This remarkable qualifying performance for Alpine F1 is a significant uplift for the French team, even eclipsing the excitement generated by his teammate Esteban Ocon’s third-place start in the challenging wet conditions of Brazil. What makes Gasly’s achievement particularly noteworthy is that it was accomplished in dry conditions, on a unique street circuit, and under unusually low temperatures, placing Alpine ahead of formidable rivals like McLaren and Red Bull.
Advert | Become a Supporter & go ad-free
This stellar result is a testament to Alpine’s relentless development efforts throughout a tumultuous season. The team, which began the year as one of the slowest on the grid for four consecutive rounds, has undergone a dramatic transformation. While the specific characteristics of the Las Vegas street circuit might have played a role, Gasly’s performance is clearly part of a broader upward trend in the team’s capabilities, spearheaded by a significant upgrade package introduced for the A524 chassis at the United States Grand Prix. This strategic enhancement has evidently unlocked a new level of pace and confidence for the Enstone-based squad, signaling a promising end to an otherwise challenging campaign.
The journey from the back of the pack to a top-three qualifying spot is nothing short of remarkable. Alpine’s progression is visually captured in performance metrics, showing a clear improvement curve. For instance, a hypothetical “Team Ranking” chart would illustrate their steady climb in competitive standing. This is not merely a single-race anomaly; in the last five races, Alpine has delivered three of its strongest performances in terms of raw one-lap pace. Over this period, their average deficit to the front-runners has shrunk to a mere 0.92%, a monumental improvement compared to the devastating 1.97% deficit they faced during the initial five races of the season. This represents more than a twofold increase in relative performance, underscoring the effectiveness of their development program.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Gasly himself expressed sheer disbelief and joy following his qualifying lap. “It’s absolutely incredible,” he beamed after stepping out of the car. “We started Bahrain on the last row with both cars, and all of a sudden, the last few weeks have been quite a change.” This sentiment perfectly encapsulates the emotional rollercoaster the team and drivers have endured. Despite a season marked by significant disruption, including the arrival of Oliver Oakes as the new team principal just eight rounds ago and the departure of several key technical personnel since early last year, Alpine has managed to pull together and find performance.
“I’m really happy and pleased with the work the team has been doing in a season where everything looked impossible, just to still stick together and put some more performance in that car,” Gasly elaborated, highlighting the resilience and dedication within the team. He candidly admitted that a top-three start was beyond their expectations for the session. “Going into qualifying today, I must admit we never thought we’ll be in a position to actually get in that top three, but I managed to have a very special lap at the right time on that last set in Q3 and it’s a very nice surprise.” This suggests a perfectly executed lap under pressure, maximizing the car’s potential at the critical moment.
A crucial factor in Alpine’s Las Vegas success, according to Gasly, was their aggressive car setup, specifically opting for a very low-downforce package. “We went with a pretty aggressive package in terms of downforce, so we are running very little downforce around this track,” he explained. “We try to maximise the straight lines, we obviously make our lives slightly harder in the corners.” This setup prioritizes straight-line speed, a significant advantage on the long straights of the Las Vegas circuit, but poses challenges in the slower, tighter corners where grip and aerodynamic stability are paramount. The delicate balance struck by the team in managing these trade-offs clearly paid dividends in qualifying.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
However, this aggressive low-downforce strategy presents a critical question for the upcoming race: how will it impact tire degradation? This concern is particularly pertinent given Gasly’s experience in last year’s Las Vegas Grand Prix. In that race, he notably struggled with tire management, falling from third place during the mid-phase of the race to ultimately finish outside the points. The potential for a repeat scenario will be a major strategic consideration for Alpine, as maintaining tire integrity over a full race distance on this demanding street circuit could be the key to converting a strong qualifying into valuable championship points.
Looking back at the 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix, Alpine demonstrated reasonable single-lap strength, suggesting a foundational compatibility with the circuit’s layout. However, it’s worth noting that three other teams, including McLaren, achieved greater year-on-year performance improvements than Alpine. Interestingly, McLaren, despite being one of the four quickest teams for the majority of the season, found themselves not among the top four for the first time since Bahrain in this qualifying session. Last year, both Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri experienced an early exit in Q1 at Las Vegas, highlighting the unpredictable nature of this unique track.
The notoriously poor grip conditions at the Las Vegas circuit once again proved to be a significant factor, impacting overall lap times and driver confidence. Despite ongoing discussions about potential track surface improvements, the inherent low-grip characteristic remained. This is underscored by the fact that George Russell secured pole position with a lap time only four-tenths of a second quicker than the best time from the previous year. This minimal improvement in lap times year-on-year, despite car development, emphasizes the limitations imposed by the track surface and the cool temperatures, making every tenth of a second hard-earned.
Qualifying Sector Times: A Detailed Analysis
Delving into the sector times offers a granular look at where each driver and team found and lost time around the Las Vegas circuit. Pierre Gasly’s fourth-place overall in qualifying was built on a balanced performance, with his most significant strength evident in Sector 3, where he posted the second-fastest time. This highlights the effectiveness of Alpine’s low-downforce setup in the faster, flowing sections and the final straight.
| P. | # | Driver | S1 | S2 | S3 | Ultimate lap (deficit) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | George Russell | 25.736 (1) | 30.845 (1) | 35.66 (7) | 1’32.241 (+0.071) |
| 2 | 55 | Carlos Sainz Jnr | 26.051 (3) | 30.911 (3) | 35.448 (1) | 1’32.410 |
| 3 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | 26 (2) | 30.927 (4) | 35.574 (4) | 1’32.501 (+0.066) |
| 4 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | 26.212 (8) | 30.928 (5) | 35.514 (2) | 1’32.654 (+0.010) |
| 5 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | 26.23 (9) | 30.898 (2) | 35.548 (3) | 1’32.676 (+0.107) |
| 6 | 1 | Max Verstappen | 26.067 (4) | 30.929 (6) | 35.703 (9) | 1’32.699 (+0.098) |
| 7 | 4 | Lando Norris | 26.199 (7) | 31.012 (8) | 35.613 (6) | 1’32.824 (+0.184) |
| 8 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | 26.161 (6) | 31.119 (9) | 35.693 (8) | 1’32.973 (+0.051) |
| 9 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | 26.108 (5) | 31.133 (11) | 35.754 (12) | 1’32.995 (+0.034) |
| 10 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | 26.353 (11) | 30.942 (7) | 35.723 (10) | 1’33.018 (+0.044) |
| 11 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | 26.434 (14) | 31.193 (12) | 35.594 (5) | 1’33.221 |
| 12 | 20 | Kevin Magnussen | 26.341 (10) | 31.129 (10) | 35.789 (14) | 1’33.259 (+0.038) |
| 13 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | 26.398 (13) | 31.298 (15) | 35.749 (11) | 1’33.445 (+0.301) |
| 14 | 24 | Zhou Guanyu | 26.355 (12) | 31.266 (13) | 35.945 (15) | 1’33.566 |
| 15 | 30 | Liam Lawson | 26.469 (15) | 31.296 (14) | 36.03 (18) | 1’33.795 (+0.292) |
| 16 | 23 | Alexander Albon | 26.756 (19) | 31.579 (18) | 35.782 (13) | 1’34.117 (+0.308) |
| 17 | 11 | Sergio Perez | 26.635 (17) | 31.535 (17) | 35.964 (16) | 1’34.134 (+0.021) |
| 18 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | 26.656 (18) | 31.599 (19) | 35.97 (17) | 1’34.225 (+0.033) |
| 19 | 77 | Valtteri Bottas | 26.587 (16) | 31.768 (20) | 36.075 (19) | 1’34.430 |
| 20 | 18 | Lance Stroll | 26.834 (20) | 31.446 (16) | 36.204 (20) | 1’34.484 |
Pole-sitter George Russell demonstrated exceptional consistency, leading in both Sector 1 and Sector 2. Carlos Sainz Jnr, who ultimately qualified second, showcased his prowess with the fastest Sector 3 time, underscoring Ferrari’s straight-line speed. Max Verstappen, surprisingly down in sixth, had competitive Sector 1 and 2 times but lost crucial tenths in Sector 3. Esteban Ocon, despite qualifying 11th, managed to secure the fifth-fastest Sector 3 time, suggesting Alpine’s car indeed excelled in the higher-speed parts of the circuit, confirming Gasly’s comments on their low-downforce setup.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a daily email with all our latest stories – and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:
2024 Las Vegas Grand Prix: Related Articles
- “Disappointing” Las Vegas GP performance prompts ticketing changes for 2025 race
- Vowles clarifies Colapinto’s claim he was concussed in Las Vegas crash
- Norris lost title because McLaren weren’t competitive enough early on – Stella
- Ferrari are now in their longest-ever championship drought
- F1 “was trying too hard” in first year at Las Vegas – Sainz
Browse all 2024 Las Vegas Grand Prix articles