F1 Drivers Divided: Was the Las Vegas Strip Circuit a Thrilling Spectacle or a Flawed Experiment?

The inaugural Formula 1 Las Vegas Grand Prix brought with it an immense amount of anticipation, spectacle, and, ultimately, a fierce debate about the quality of its new street circuit. Was the Las Vegas Strip Circuit merely a simplistic layout designed solely to encourage DRS passes, prioritizing show over sport? Or did it emerge as a surprisingly challenging and thrillingly fast street track that delivered genuine racing excitement?

The venue for this highly anticipated event in the heart of Las Vegas provoked a spectrum of responses from the elite drivers, with their opinions often colored by their individual successes, their car’s suitability to the unique layout, and their personal preferences for circuit design. This article delves into the diverse perspectives of F1’s top competitors, exploring their initial trepidations, their in-race experiences, and their ultimate conclusions on the Las Vegas Strip Circuit’s place in the Formula 1 calendar.

Pre-Race Skepticism vs. Post-Race Realities on the Vegas Track

Before the lights went out for the very first Las Vegas Grand Prix, a significant number of drivers voiced concerns. Many feared the new street track wouldn’t present a substantial driving challenge, expressing doubts that overtaking would be difficult despite the presence of numerous long straights. These concerns were primarily rooted in predictions of a lack of grip on the newly laid asphalt and the potential for the Drag Reduction System (DRS) to be less effective than anticipated on such a fresh, untreated surface.

However, once the chequered flag fell, a notable shift in sentiment occurred among the paddock. While some pre-race concerns lingered, the grand prix delivered a surprisingly entertaining race with plenty of overtakes. This improvement was partly attributed to the strategic extension of the DRS zone on the iconic Strip just before final practice, a crucial adjustment that enhanced racing dynamics. Despite the improved overtaking, the underlying issue of low grip remained a consistent point of contention for many drivers. A select few even offered specific, actionable ideas on how to refine and improve the circuit’s layout for future events, aiming to balance the spectacle with genuine sporting challenge.

Here’s a detailed look at what the Formula 1 drivers had to say about the Las Vegas Strip Circuit, offering a fascinating glimpse into the minds of those who pushed the limits on this unique urban track.

Driver Insights: Unpacking the Las Vegas Strip Circuit Experience

Max Verstappen: A Skeptic Convinced by the Racing Action

Red Bull’s reigning world champion, Max Verstappen, was notably reserved in his praise for the Las Vegas Grand Prix event and initially described the track layout as too simplistic and unchallenging before the weekend even began. Yet, even he conceded that the circuit was likely to produce good racing. After the grand prix, he attributed the surprisingly strong on-track action to several key factors that mitigated his initial reservations:

“I think low degradation on the hard tyre certainly played a role.”

“A lot of slipstreaming with the extremely long straights and probably a bit of a headwind on the main straight as well, which makes the tow more effective.”

“I think the low-speed corners, when you’re following another car, you don’t really lose that much time because they are genuinely that slow, these corners. This means you can stay closer and set up overtakes.”

“And then there’s a lot of draft opportunities around the track: after turn four to five, from turn nine to 12, and then of course all the way from 12 to 14, and then from 16 to turn one is, again, a massive draft-fest. So all these prolonged slipstreaming zones made the racing much, much better than anticipated.”

Verstappen’s analysis highlights how the unique combination of tire characteristics and the circuit’s layout, particularly its extensive straight sections, synergized to create plentiful overtaking opportunities despite the perceived lack of technical challenge.

Charles Leclerc: From Struggle to Delight

Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc, who came incredibly close to clinching victory and ultimately finished a strong second, expressed genuine surprise at how much easier overtaking proved to be during the race compared to his experiences in the second practice session. This significant improvement, he noted, came after the crucial extension of the DRS zone on the iconic Strip.

“I absolutely loved the racing out there. Honestly, I did not expect to have that much fun in the race because in FP2, I remember following George [Russell], and I really struggled immensely to overtake him. It felt incredibly difficult.”

“Then we made adjustments, went down on the downforce levels for the race, and today was just so much better. I had a lot more fun behind the wheel, fighting for positions.”

“It turned out to be a really exciting race, and I’m pretty sure it was a fantastic one to watch for the fans at home and trackside. So, I’ll definitely make sure I watch that race back, because from inside the cockpit, it felt special.”

Leclerc’s comments underscore the impact of strategic adjustments, both by the FIA with DRS and by the teams with car setup, in transforming a potentially processional race into a thrilling spectacle, highlighting the dynamic nature of F1 strategy on a new circuit.

Sergio Perez: The Persistent Problem of Low Grip

A recurring and significant theme among many drivers throughout the Las Vegas Grand Prix weekend was the pervasive lack of grip on the track surface. While the race itself was characterized by numerous position changes and exciting battles, several drivers remained deeply concerned about the extraordinarily low levels of adhesion they experienced, which added an unpredictable element to the driving.

“The low grip, I think that was something that really caught us out. The asphalt, basically, how low the grip was from the very start. And really, how we finished it was still extremely on the low side. It made conditions very tricky and demanding.”

“It’s always going to be like that to some extent because we didn’t have any support events running throughout the weekend to lay down rubber. So maybe it’s something that can also be improved for next year, to have more racing categories over the weekend to help rubber in the track and increase grip levels.”

Perez’s insightful suggestion regarding support categories offers a practical solution to a fundamental issue faced by many new street circuits, where the lack of prior track activity prevents optimal rubber build-up, thus impacting overall performance and safety for the main event.

Esteban Ocon: From Grid to Glory with Genuine Overtakes

Alpine’s Esteban Ocon delivered one of the standout performances of the race, climbing an impressive 12 positions from 16th on the grid to finish fourth. After such a strong showing, Ocon was effusive in his praise for the circuit, particularly its ability to facilitate engaging racing.

“The track has been genuinely fun to race on, and I had a strong feeling that would be the case, especially with those incredibly long straights promoting slipstreaming.”

“As expected, with such long straights, it was always going to lead to some really good racing and plenty of opportunities to fight for position.”

“I even had some good, proper moves in the tighter sections as well, not just relying on the fast parts. People might be quick to say it’s only DRS overtakes and therefore boring, but I had a very satisfying pass on the brakes into turn seven against Logan [Sargeant], which demonstrates that strategic driving was still rewarded. So, that was a lot of fun, and it shows the track offers more than just straight-line speed battles.”

Ocon’s experience challenges the common criticism that street circuits with long straights lead only to simplistic DRS passes, proving that skillful driving and well-executed maneuvers were still possible in the more technical sections of the Las Vegas track.

Lance Stroll: A Fun Challenge Reminiscent of Baku

Lance Stroll of Aston Martin was another driver who made significant progress through the field, rising impressively to fifth place from a challenging back-row starting position. He, too, offered high praise for the circuit’s characteristics, drawing a compelling comparison.

“I definitely enjoyed it. Nothing really negative to say. It was actually a lot of fun to race, a little bit like Baku, in terms of the mix of super-long straights and tight, technical sections that demand precision.”

Stroll’s comparison to the Baku City Circuit is particularly insightful, as Baku is widely regarded as one of F1’s most exciting street tracks, known for its unique blend of extreme top speeds and challenging slow-speed corners, leading to unpredictable and thrilling races. This suggests that Las Vegas shares some of those dynamic qualities, contributing to its surprising raceability.

Carlos Sainz Jnr: Safety Concerns and Corner Design Critique

While Lando Norris tragically crashed heavily at Turn 12 during the race and was taken to hospital, preventing him from speaking to the media, his former teammate Carlos Sainz Jnr raised significant concerns about the safety and design of that specific corner, particularly the proximity of the wall and its impact on racing.

“It’s a decent racing track overall, good for racing in many parts. But for me, maybe turn 12 is a bit too dangerous with the wall coming towards you at such speed. The run-off area there is really minimal, and it creates a very high-risk situation.”

“I think we can definitely do a better shape for that corner, not just for safety but also to improve the racing, because currently, it’s very difficult to follow another car closely through there and attempt an overtake. So, hopefully, this gets better for next year, with some necessary modifications to enhance both safety and on-track action.”

Sainz’s critique underscores the critical balance between speed, excitement, and driver safety on street circuits. His suggestion for a redesigned Turn 12 highlights a key area for potential improvement on the Las Vegas layout, aiming for both enhanced safety and better racing lines.

Lewis Hamilton: Vegas is “Like Baku But Better”

The Las Vegas Strip Circuit drew comparisons from many drivers, including Mercedes’ seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton, to the Baku City Circuit in Azerbaijan—another high-speed, demanding street track known for its long straights and tight sections. Hamilton, known for his candid opinions, was particularly positive about the race itself.

“The race was great. Honestly, it was one of the best races of the season. So many people, all the media, everyone’s been so incredibly negative about this race and about the show and everything surrounding it. My advice was just to let it be, reserve judgment, and see how it actually goes.”

“And what we got was a great race. This is like Baku, but arguably even better in terms of the sheer spectacle and the overall experience. It delivered on the excitement front.”

Hamilton’s strong endorsement, especially his comparison to a fan-favorite like Baku, provides a powerful counter-narrative to the initial skepticism. His focus on the “great race” and the overall show suggests that for him, and likely for many fans, the Las Vegas Grand Prix ultimately delivered on its promise of F1 spectacle.

George Russell: More Challenging Than Anticipated, But Overtaking Still Tricky

Hamilton’s Mercedes teammate, George Russell, was open to admitting that the Las Vegas Strip Circuit was not as straightforward or simplistic as he had initially expected. While he revised his initial assessment of the track’s inherent challenge, he maintained the view that pure overtaking was not inherently easy, a factor potentially exacerbated by Mercedes’ car characteristics, which often featured higher drag levels.

“The track was actually a lot better to drive than I anticipated before the weekend. It looked pretty basic, even dull, from just a track map, but out there on the asphalt, it actually has quite a lot of character and proved to be a really challenging circuit to drive at the limit.”

“However, with the very nature of a low-downforce circuit like this, the slipstreaming effect wasn’t as substantial as one might think for generating easy overtakes. I’m not sure how many overtakes there were in total during the race, but I can tell you it certainly wasn’t straightforward to pass cars cleanly.”

Russell’s perspective offers a nuanced view, acknowledging the unexpected driving challenge while still pointing out the difficulties in executing overtakes, suggesting that the dynamics of a high-speed, low-downforce street circuit can be complex and sometimes counter-intuitive.

Fernando Alonso: A Veteran’s Call for Calendar Balance

While several drivers lauded the thrilling quality of the F1 race in Las Vegas, the grid’s most experienced competitor, Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso, issued a cautious warning. He stressed that the series should not unequivocally adopt the Las Vegas model as the template for all future events, advocating for a broader calendar philosophy.

“We absolutely need a balance in our calendar. As we, all the drivers, said this week – there isn’t much fun to be had driving in this kind of circuit at these extreme speeds, hitting 360kph, with absolutely no grip, very poor visibility, and the car bouncing like hell on the uneven surfaces. These kinds of conditions are very demanding and less enjoyable from a pure driving perspective.”

“I understand that this show, from the outside looking in, perhaps looks incredibly good and entertaining for the audience. But these Formula 1 cars are simply not made to go around corners at 80kph. These magnificent machines are designed to go flat-out at Suzuka, to carve through corners at Barcelona, to push the limits at Silverstone, and truly maximize the incredible potential of a Formula 1 car on circuits that challenge them in every aspect.”

“So, I strongly believe we need to balance the championship and balance the calendar. I think it’s what we are trying to do, but I don’t think that this kind of circuit is the only way to go forward. We need to have to keep some traditional races as well, the classic tracks where the Formula 1 car can truly shine and show its ultimate performance.”

Alonso’s powerful statement encapsulates the dichotomy between “show” and “sport,” advocating for a nuanced approach that preserves the integrity of Formula 1 as a pinnacle of motorsport, allowing cars to perform at their peak on purpose-built tracks, while still embracing the spectacle of new venues.

Oscar Piastri: A Rookie’s Mixed Feelings

Rookie sensation Oscar Piastri’s comments were highly representative of a common sentiment among many drivers: he found the circuit to be relatively unchallenging from a driving perspective, yet simultaneously acknowledged that it produced a surprisingly good race, highlighting the distinction between driver experience and spectator entertainment.

“To drive it, it’s certainly not on my ‘favorites’ list. It doesn’t offer the same kind of satisfying challenge as some other circuits. But to race on it, honestly, it’s quite good, surprisingly so.”

“I think the specific DRS zone leading into that final chicane was designed with a pretty good length, making it not a super-simple, automatic overtake into that corner. So, I think that was a positive design choice, demanding more skill than just pressing a button.”

“Of course, a lot of people were on different tire strategies, many suffering with graining, some not, so it naturally created significant pace differences between a lot of cars. And to be honest, I think at any circuit where you have that variance, you’re going to get exciting racing. This was particularly true here because, going into the race, we genuinely thought it would be quite difficult to overtake with the low grip.”

“So, it was a pleasant surprise in terms of the racing, and hopefully, it was entertaining for everyone watching.”

Piastri’s analysis points to the multifaceted nature of a good F1 race, where factors beyond just the track layout – such as tire management, strategy, and variable pace – can converge to create compelling on-track action, even on circuits that might not be a driver’s ultimate favorite for pure driving enjoyment.

Daniel Ricciardo: Seeking Grip and Safer Conditions

The AlphaTauri drivers endured a particularly challenging weekend, as their car seemed to struggle significantly with the inherently low-grip nature of the Las Vegas Strip Circuit. Veteran driver Daniel Ricciardo offered specific suggestions, believing that holding track sessions earlier in the day when the track temperature might be warmer could be beneficial.

“It was definitely sketchy out there. And if other drivers are saying it was sketchy, for us, it was really, truly sketchy, probably even more so given our car’s characteristics on low-grip surfaces.”

“I don’t know what flexibility they have with track opening times, but if they do have any leeway, I think for everyone’s health and safety, bringing the sessions forward would be a wise move. Maybe a bit more temperature in the asphalt would help, but also just everyone would be operating with a little bit more juice in the tank, feeling more comfortable with the conditions.”

“Maybe they could also do something to the surface itself. I know in Saudi Arabia, for example, they pressure wash it or apply some treatment to improve the surface. So, maybe they could do some similar treatment to the Las Vegas track to make it a bit more abrasive and help to generate more grip for the tires.”

Ricciardo’s practical suggestions underscore the importance of track preparation and environmental factors on driver safety and performance, highlighting potential avenues for optimizing the Las Vegas circuit’s conditions in the future.

Zhou Guanyu: The Daily Reset of Track Conditions

Alfa Romeo’s Zhou Guanyu echoed Daniel Ricciardo’s comments regarding the persistent low grip and dustiness, pinpointing a crucial issue unique to a temporary street circuit. He noted that the constant need to reopen the track to public traffic meant that any improvements in grip levels from rubber laid down during F1 sessions were effectively erased every 24 hours.

“The racing wasn’t bad, but it was incredibly dusty, which definitely contributed to the low grip. I think the only thing that wasn’t ideal was just the tarmac we had this weekend. It was almost worse than Doha in FP1, if you compare the initial grip levels.”

“Every single day, the tarmac felt like it was going back to the starting point in terms of grip, because it was cleaned or opened to public traffic. So, if we can have tarmac similar to Jeddah, which provides much more consistent and higher grip levels, it would make the race a lot more entertaining and safer.”

Zhou’s observation about the “daily reset” of the track surface offers a critical insight into the challenges of temporary street circuits and emphasizes the need for solutions, such as surface treatments or consistent pre-event running, to ensure optimal racing conditions.

Logan Sargeant: Local Insights for Track Enhancement

Home town racer Logan Sargeant, driving for Williams, offered some precise thoughts on how to refine and improve specific elements of the Las Vegas Strip Circuit to enhance the racing experience and driver comfort.

“I think maybe some of the kerbs could be a little bit nicer to ride, making them less harsh and more forgiving. Specifically, the apex kerb at Turn 12, and the apex kerb at Turn 15, could probably just be removed. Taking that one out would open that corner up a little bit, potentially making it faster and improving racing lines. Other than those minor points, I’d say it’s pretty solid overall.”

Sargeant’s detailed suggestions about kerb design demonstrate how even small modifications can significantly impact a driver’s ability to attack a corner, find a racing line, and improve the overall flow and safety of a circuit, providing valuable feedback for future iterations of the track.

Valtteri Bottas: A Staunch Defender of Vegas’s Racing Potential

Alfa Romeo’s Valtteri Bottas was unwavering in his belief that the Las Vegas Strip Circuit was inherently good for racing and didn’t necessarily require significant changes, despite spending much of his own race stuck at the back of the field due to first-lap damage. His perspective remained consistently positive regarding the circuit’s fundamental design.

“I always thought it’s going to be a very good track for racing, even before we arrived. I think today’s race absolutely showed that, yes, it lived up to that expectation. It would have been truly nice to be a part of all that action, actually playing around and fighting for positions, but unfortunately, I was a bit more like a sitting duck myself with the damage.”

“Nevertheless, based on what I saw and experienced, I firmly believe it deserves a permanent place on the Formula 1 calendar. It delivered the kind of racing we want to see.”

Bottas’s steadfast conviction, even in the face of his own challenging race, underscores the prevailing sentiment among many drivers that the Las Vegas circuit, despite its perceived simplicity or grip issues, ultimately delivered a compelling on-track spectacle that merits its inclusion in the F1 championship.

Nico Hulkenberg: Success Within Constraints

Haas driver Nico Hulkenberg demonstrated a pragmatic understanding of the unique limitations and circumstances F1 faced in constructing and designing a circuit in the heart of Las Vegas. He felt that, given these inherent constraints, the track designers had largely succeeded in their endeavor.

“It’s good, actually. Obviously, there’s a specific set of circumstances and limitations that they have to build and design the circuit around, primarily dictated by the iconic Strip and the available plots of land. But I actually enjoyed driving it; I think the track’s quite cool, considering what they had to work with.”

Hulkenberg’s perspective provides valuable context, acknowledging the engineering and logistical challenges of creating a Formula 1 circuit in such a unique urban environment. His positive assessment, within these acknowledged constraints, suggests that the designers effectively maximized the potential of the available space to create a functional and enjoyable racing venue.

The Verdict on the Las Vegas Strip Circuit: A Promising Future?

The inaugural Las Vegas Grand Prix and its innovative Strip Circuit ultimately delivered a race that was far more exciting and unpredictable than many initially feared. While the perennial issue of low grip remained a consistent complaint, the extended DRS zones, combined with the track’s distinctive layout of long straights and slow corners, fostered an environment ripe for overtaking and genuine on-track battles. Drivers were undeniably divided: some praised its thrilling racing potential and spectacle, while others maintained concerns about its challenge for pure driving and safety in specific areas.

The discussions among the drivers highlight crucial areas for potential improvements. Suggestions ranged from scheduling support races to help rubber-in the track surface and implementing surface treatments to improve grip, to specific design modifications for corners like Turn 12 and adjustments to kerbs. These insights are invaluable as Formula 1 looks to refine and optimize the Las Vegas Strip Circuit for future editions.

Ultimately, the Las Vegas Grand Prix carved out a unique niche in the F1 calendar. It showcased that a circuit can be simultaneously criticized for its driving characteristics yet celebrated for the quality of its racing spectacle. As F1 continues to expand into new territories, the lessons learned from Las Vegas will undoubtedly shape the future of circuit design, balancing the demands of pure motorsport with the allure of a captivating show. The Las Vegas Strip Circuit, despite its controversies, has firmly established itself as a talking point, and its evolution will be keenly watched by fans and drivers alike.

Explore More from the 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix

• Tost blames track inspection oversight for Sainz’s damage in Las Vegas
• Hard to repeat “rare” combination of factors behind Vegas shunt – Norris
• Las Vegas Grand Prix “got a lot more hate than it deserved” – Sargeant
• Williams’ “incredible” Vegas qualifying made us “poor” in race – Vowles
• Piastri is first rookie to take two fastest laps in a season since Hamilton

Browse all 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix articles