Formula 1, often hailed as the pinnacle of motorsport, is constantly striving to enhance the spectacle for its global fanbase. At the heart of this pursuit lies the perennial challenge of improving overtaking – a key ingredient for thrilling races. Ross Brawn, Formula 1’s managing director for motorsport, has unequivocally stated that the controversial Drag Reduction System (DRS) will remain a fixture in the short term, serving as a critical “Band-Aid” until a more organic solution to aid overtaking can be developed and implemented.
The DRS, introduced in 2011, allows a driver to open a flap on their rear wing in designated zones during a race, provided they are within one second of the car ahead. This reduces aerodynamic drag, leading to a temporary speed boost and theoretically making overtakes easier. While it has undoubtedly increased the number of overtaking manoeuvres, it has also drawn criticism for being an artificial aid, often making passes feel less earned or strategic. Brawn’s remarks in Business Life magazine underscore the temporary nature of this device, reflecting a broader ambition within Formula 1 to evolve beyond such engineered solutions.
“My hope is that when we identify how the cars should evolve in the future, that may be a feature we can turn off. But I don’t see it disappearing in the near future. It’s a necessary Band-Aid because of the nature of the cars at the moment,” Brawn articulated, highlighting the current dependency on DRS due to the inherent aerodynamic characteristics of modern F1 cars. The challenge lies in the “dirty air” phenomenon, where a following car loses significant downforce when trailing another closely, making it incredibly difficult to maintain pace and launch an attack without external assistance.
Formula 1 has embarked on an intensive research and development programme aimed at fundamentally redesigning the cars to allow for closer racing without compromising performance or relying on artificial aids. The ultimate objective is to create an environment where drivers can genuinely battle wheel-to-wheel, with overtaking becoming a natural consequence of superior skill, car performance, and strategic prowess, rather than a push of a button. Brawn emphasized this long-term vision, stating, “That’s our objective. And unlike the DRS, it won’t be a switch we turn on overnight, it will be an evolution of the cars. Each step we make has got to be in that direction.”
This evolutionary approach signifies a departure from incremental tweaks, moving towards a holistic redesign of Formula 1 machinery. The core of this strategy involves a sophisticated modeling system designed to predict and analyze the impact of various car design elements on raceability. Brawn elaborated on this advanced methodology: “In other words, we create a model, and that model means as you plug features in, you can see whether the raceability of the cars improves or deteriorates. And that model won’t only be an aerodynamic model, it will be a model that will have to include the tyre characteristics and engine characteristics and other factors on the car, where we put different elements in to help us understand whether what we are doing is making the racing better or worse.”
Such a comprehensive simulation environment is crucial for understanding the complex interplay between different car components and their cumulative effect on how cars behave in close proximity. Historically, F1 car development has often relied on a combination of intuition, empirical testing, and iterative design cycles. However, as the cars have grown exponentially in complexity and performance, this traditional approach has become insufficient. Brawn candidly admitted, “And that’s something we’ve lacked. We’ve been using our intuition, and that’s not good enough now with the complexity of these cars.” The new modeling paradigm promises a data-driven, scientific method to validate design changes before committing to costly and time-consuming physical prototypes.
The Impact of 2017 Regulations: Speed vs. Overtaking
The urgency for this fundamental rethink became particularly apparent following the introduction of new technical regulations in 2017. These rules significantly increased aerodynamic downforce, leading to immensely faster lap times. While the cars became breathtakingly quick, setting new track records, the unintended consequence was a significant reduction in overtaking opportunities. Data from Pirelli, Formula 1’s sole tyre supplier, revealed a stark reality: there were 47% fewer overtaking moves in the 2017 season compared to the previous year. This statistical decline underscored a critical trade-off between outright speed and competitive racing, prompting serious introspection within the sport’s leadership.
The pursuit of blistering lap speeds has long been a hallmark of Formula 1, cementing its status as the fastest racing series on the planet. Fans often marvel at the raw pace and technological prowess on display. However, Brawn acknowledged that this pursuit must be balanced with the entertainment value of the sport. He expressed a willingness to compromise on speed if it ultimately led to a more engaging product for the audience. “The speed of the cars is important – these are the fastest racing cars in the world, and the fans want to feel that Formula One is the pinnacle. But tomorrow if I could trade five miles an hour from the top speed for better racing, I’d do it,” he affirmed. This statement encapsulates a significant philosophical shift: while F1 must remain at the cutting edge of automotive technology, the primary goal is to deliver captivating on-track action.
The challenge, therefore, is multifaceted. It involves designing cars that are both incredibly fast and capable of racing closely without their performance being severely hampered by aerodynamic turbulence. This requires an intricate understanding of how air flows around and through the cars, particularly in wake conditions. The goal is not just to make cars faster, but to make them race better, providing drivers with more opportunities to showcase their talent in direct combat.
The ongoing work led by Ross Brawn and his technical team represents a crucial turning point for Formula 1. By adopting a scientific, data-driven approach to car design and regulation development, the sport aims to move beyond superficial fixes like DRS. The ultimate vision is a future where the cars themselves are engineered to promote thrilling, natural overtaking, ensuring that Formula 1 retains its status as the pinnacle of motorsport, not just in terms of speed, but also in terms of pure racing excitement and spectacle. This long-term commitment to innovation and fan engagement promises a brighter, more competitive era for Grand Prix racing, where every pass is earned and every battle is a testament to driver skill and engineering brilliance.
Go ad-free for just £1 per month>> Find out more and sign up
Related Articles: Exploring the 2018 F1 Season and Beyond
- F1 feared “death knell” for Drive to Survive after Ferrari and Mercedes snub
- McLaren staff told us we were “totally crazy” to take Honda engines in 2018 – Tost
- ‘It doesn’t matter if we start last’: How Red Bull’s junior team aided Honda’s leap forward
- Honda’s jet division helped F1 engineers solve power unit problem
- McLaren Racing losses rise after Honda split
Browse all 2018 F1 season articles