Liberty Media’s quarterly earnings calls offer an insightful glimpse into the strategic management of its diverse portfolio, which includes significant investments such as the audio streaming giant SiriusXM, the professional baseball team Atlanta Braves, and of course, the pinnacle of motorsport, the Formula 1 Group. These calls are meticulously orchestrated to provide crucial information to the investor community, striking a delicate balance between transparency and avoiding over-promising or making premature commitments.
The most recent call, held last Friday, commenced with the standard ‘safe harbor’ disclaimers, a legal formality, before delving into Liberty Media’s first-quarter results for 2021. The discussion clearly demonstrated the profound understanding and comprehensive control that the executive team of F1’s commercial rights owner has cultivated over a business it officially acquired in 2017. Prior to this acquisition, Liberty Media had no direct exposure to the intricate world of Formula 1 and its multifaceted complexities, making their current command of the sport’s operations particularly impressive.
Adding to this impressive display was the debut performance of incoming F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali, who confidently fielded a barrage of questions from astute financial analysts. Domenicali is no stranger to the Formula 1 paddock, having previously enjoyed a successful tenure as team principal for Ferrari. Beyond motorsport, his business acumen is well-established, notably having doubled the sales volumes of Lamborghini during his time as CEO. However, Wall Street analysts operate with a distinct set of expectations and a sharp, often probing, analytical approach, making his assured handling of the call a significant achievement.
The financial figures presented during the call marked a substantial rebound from a devastating first quarter in 2020. The onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic led to the cancellation of all scheduled races during that period, resulting in a paltry $17 million in incidental income and significant costs incurred for the prematurely canceled Australian and Bahrain Grands Prix. In stark contrast, the latest figures reveal a robust revenue of $159 million for Q1 2021, signaling a considerable improvement in the sport’s financial health. Last year’s staggering $137 million loss in the first quarter has been dramatically reduced to a more manageable $33 million deficit for the corresponding period in 2021, underscoring the sport’s resilient recovery trajectory.
While the first quarter of 2021 still registered a loss, the upward trend is undeniably encouraging, especially considering that only a single Grand Prix contributed to the revenue during this period. Had two races been staged, as was standard practice pre-COVID, the financial outcome could very well have shifted into profitability. With six races currently scheduled for the second quarter – each a significant revenue contributor, including the prestigious Monaco Grand Prix – there is strong confidence that F1 will return to a paper profit. Even accounting for potential future calendar changes, such as the uncertainty surrounding the Turkish Grand Prix due to evolving travel restrictions, the financial outlook for Q2 remains positive, indicating a return to fiscal stability for the sport.
F1 currently boasts a substantial cash reserve of $1.8 billion, a strategic buffer designed to navigate periods of adversity. Greg Maffei, Liberty Media’s CEO, explained the necessity of this contingency: “We’ve had to cancel, for example, Canada and input Turkey in,” he stated, shortly before news emerged about Turkey’s precarious position on the travel red list for British citizens. He further elaborated, “We are getting paid for that, but those [amounts] are at way reduced levels compared to what we would get if we had full fans. So we have a fairly large contingency in our own budgeting for the potential that we will not get the kind of revenues that we hope.”
Maffei emphasized the utility of this robust cash position, stating, “Therefore, that cash is useful.” He added a forward-looking perspective: “But as the year progresses and we get more certainty about promoter revenue, we will look at what we do with that cash.” This approach highlights a commitment to prudent financial management and a cautious stance in an unpredictable global environment, ensuring F1’s resilience against unforeseen challenges.
In addition to standard race promotion income, Liberty Media’s official press release noted a unique revenue stream in Q1 2021: “Race promotion revenue in the first quarter of 2021 included proceeds from a one-time settlement related to the cancellation of a race originally scheduled to commence in 2020.” This one-time influx would have significantly bolstered income and helped mitigate the overall Q1 losses. While not explicitly named, speculation points to the Vietnamese Grand Prix, which was canceled last year and subsequently removed from the 2021 calendar following fraud charges against its promoter. Our records indicate an annual fee of $35 million, with a 5% escalator through 2024, suggesting the settlement could have ranged from $35 million to potentially $180 million. The implication, however, is clear: the Hanoi street circuit is unlikely to feature on the F1 calendar again.
Liberty’s Chief Financial Officer, Brian Wendling, addressed the settlement with a measured and somewhat evasive tone when questioned by analysts. “As it relates to the settlement, we can’t comment on the specific details, but it did impact our results,” he stated. He then added cryptically, “But obviously, when you look at year-over-year results, the fact [is] that we had one race versus zero last year and the proportion of revenue recognition was the material driver of that, but we can’t comment on the specific settlement.” This response, while technically truthful, offered little in the way of specific details, characteristic of the cautious communication often employed in financial disclosures to avoid market speculation or legal repercussions. The financial markets, perhaps seeking more definitive answers, reacted with a degree of apprehension. The FWONK share price, which opened last week at $46.80, experienced a 6% decline, closing at $44.00 by the end of business on Friday.
Beyond the customary financial reporting, these calls often segue into a more informal, yet equally critical, segment dubbed the ‘color’ by Wall Street insiders. This is when analysts delve into the broader strategic questions, and executives, while obligated to be truthful, often employ carefully worded responses. Indiscreet disclosures can significantly impact share prices or even trigger investigations by the Securities Exchange Commission, underscoring the tightrope walk management performs during these sessions. Approximately 70% of the questions posed during the hour-long call, which covered all three Liberty Group companies, were specifically related to Formula 1 and its future prospects, highlighting its central role in Liberty Media’s portfolio.
A particularly pertinent question arose regarding the recent, albeit aborted, Super League breakaway attempt in European football and its potential ramifications for Formula 1. Greg Maffei, Liberty Media’s CEO, offered a historical perspective: “We watch Super League with interest because before we were involved with Formula 1, there was certainly the talk [in 2009] of a breakaway in Formula 1, which did not come to pass.” He confidently asserted, “We feel very confident we understand the breakaway very well, and I think we pretty much eliminated that opportunity or potential at Formula 1.” Domenicali’s boss was undoubtedly aware that the sport’s current CEO had played a crucial role in navigating the 2009 breakaway threat as Ferrari team principal, bringing invaluable experience to the current leadership team.
Maffei’s statement regarding the elimination of a breakaway threat holds a literal truth, rooted in the 2021-2025 Concorde Agreement. This pivotal document binds all signatory teams to abstain from participating in any series or championship that could reasonably be considered a direct competitor to Formula 1. However, what Maffei did not explicitly disclose is a crucial clause within this agreement: teams retain the right to terminate their obligations, provided they give notice by March 1 to depart at the end of that calendar year. This provision implies that a breakaway could indeed be orchestrated with sufficient advance notice, making the definitive nature of Maffei’s “pretty much eliminated” phrase open to interpretation. The language is not entirely binding, and it would be a miscalculation for Liberty Media to underestimate the teams’ potential to pursue alternative paths if they become dissatisfied with aspects of Liberty’s operational strategy before the 2025 agreement concludes.
Stefano Domenicali also firmly rebuffed a suggestion to retain the current technical regulations, despite the highly competitive start to the 2021 season. An analyst opined, “Max Verstappen [is] literally banging wheels with Lewis Hamilton. F1 is probably having the most competitive season since 2012, with Ferrari coming back, [a resurgent] McLaren and [the rise of] Lando Norris, et cetera.” This sentiment highlighted the excitement generated by the current racing. However, Domenicali succinctly countered, “The train has already left the station,” underscoring that development work on the radically different 2022 cars is already well into advanced stages, making a reversal of course logistically and financially unfeasible.
Domenicali articulated the rationale behind adhering to the planned regulatory overhaul: “We are very pleased because we are convinced that this year is already a great season, but next year with the changes that are planned will be another great opportunity to showcase what is Formula 1 in terms of the ability of always keeping the attention at the centre. Next year will highlight the possibility to have a bigger fight, not only two or three drivers, but even more, and that’s the objective.” This cautious yet ambitious statement reflects F1’s long-term vision for enhancing competition and generating broader interest, aiming for a more diverse field of contenders at the front of the grid.
Another analyst raised a pertinent question regarding the eventual retirements of star drivers Lewis Hamilton and Sebastian Vettel, both in their late thirties with a combined total of nearly a dozen world titles. Hamilton, in particular, stands as the sport’s most prominent figure, commanding a social media presence that dwarfs his rivals, yet he only recently signed a one-year contract extension for the 2021 F1 season, fueling speculation about his future.
Domenicali acknowledged Hamilton’s immense value: “With regard to Lewis Hamilton, surely [he] is a great asset. He’s doing an incredible job on the sporting side and in terms of image, he was able to grow Formula 1 in other areas that are not specifically related to Formula 1.” However, he quickly pivoted to emphasize the intrinsic strength of the sport itself. “But Formula 1 itself is strong, and drivers, champions are always in a place where one day they may retire,” Domenicali continued. “I don’t know what Lewis is doing. We are talking with him, but of course now he’s focused on his actual season. He’s fully boosted to make sure he’ll be the only driver that [will] win eight titles in the history of Formula 1.”
Having witnessed the ebb and flow of champions during his tenure at Ferrari, including the dominant Schumacher era, Domenicali expressed confidence in F1’s ability to thrive beyond Hamilton’s eventual retirement. He suggested that future on-track battles might even intensify without the presence of the two most dominant drivers of the past decade. It was notable, however, that Domenicali chose not to comment on Sebastian Vettel’s future at all, a deliberate omission that did not go unnoticed.
Reiterating his overarching message, Domenicali stated, “Formula 1 is solid, robust. For sure, whatever will be decision of Lewis, Formula 1 will react and we’ll move forward. The good news is that in Formula 1, we have so many good drivers today, but at least the challenge will be even stronger. Therefore, of course, whatever will be the decision of Lewis, we will respect [it], but Formula 1 is really solid and strong.” This sentiment aims to reassure investors that the sport’s appeal extends beyond any single individual, relying instead on its competitive nature and emerging talent pool. Fortunately for Liberty Media, this particular concern appears to be a longer-term consideration, as Hamilton indicated during the Spanish Grand Prix weekend his intention to extend his current contract before the summer break, hinting at continued participation in the sport for the foreseeable future.
The conversation also touched upon the strategic importance of an American driver in Formula 1 for boosting popularity within the United States. Given that Domenicali was addressing a predominantly American audience of analysts, his response was predictably diplomatic yet clear. “The answer for me is very clearly ‘yes’. We are working with teams try to understand what is the possibility for an American driver to come to the attention of Formula 1 team in the short term.”
However, Domenicali tempered expectations with a pragmatic assessment: “I don’t see, being very pragmatic and realistic, that coming [to pass] in the next two, three years, but maybe thereafter.” This long-term perspective acknowledges the significant development pathway required for an American talent to reach F1. Nevertheless, efforts by individuals like Zak Brown, who is actively advocating for compulsory testing for rookie drivers during Friday practice or in-season sessions, could accelerate this timeline. Brown, a Californian, intends to provide McLaren’s 22-year-old Mexican IndyCar winner, Pato O’Ward, with a formal F1 trial, demonstrating a tangible commitment to developing new talent with an eye on the crucial American market.
On the topic of Sprint Qualifying, which analysts referred to as a “race” without correction (a distinction often enforced with media), Maffei himself referred to it as a “Sprint Qualifying race.” Domenicali confirmed that Silverstone, slated to host the first of these experimental events, had already reported a significant surge in ticket sales following the announcement, indicating a positive initial reception from the fanbase.
The discussion also turned to the critical issue of TV rights, prompted by the impending conclusion of ESPN’s current free-to-air coverage and Disney’s decision to close its various sports broadcasters in Asia, including F1 broadcaster Star. Both deals are set to expire at the end of 2022, yet Disney plans to cease Star’s operations in October of this year, creating a unique challenge for F1’s broadcast strategy. Domenicali affirmed that Star’s contract would be enforced, suggesting that a settlement would be reached to navigate this early termination. Maffei, looking at the broader strategic landscape, spoke of a delicate “trade-off on exposure, which free TV offers against, in many cases, higher short-term rates for either over-the-top (OTT) platforms or even more streaming platforms over platforms like satellite.”
Maffei articulated F1’s strategic evaluation process: “We’ll weigh our total dollars available against the exposure that we get for things like generally promoter value and advertising and sponsorship.” Intriguingly, this perspective aligns closely with recent analyses suggesting that F1 should comprehensively evaluate the holistic impact of free-to-air television, rather than solely pursuing the most lucrative financial deals offered by pay-TV broadcasters. This approach considers the broader benefits of increased viewership and accessibility in cultivating a larger fanbase and enhancing the sport’s global appeal.
In parallel, the sport’s proprietary streaming service, F1 TV, has undergone a comprehensive revamp, resulting in a reported increase in subscriptions, though Liberty Media continues to withhold specific subscriber numbers. F1 TV Pro, which delivers live race coverage, is now accessible in 85 countries, while the non-live “Access” offering has expanded its reach to 188 territories. Domenicali highlighted F1 TV’s strong start to the season, reporting record viewing figures. He stated that ratings for individual races were approximately three times higher than the 2020 season average, with total minutes viewed over a typical Grand Prix weekend increasing by over 60% compared to last year. He also commended the enhanced functionality of the new F1 TV app, which now offers a host of additional features, further improving the fan experience.
Liberty Media deserves significant commendation for its adept management of Formula 1 throughout the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Their strategic navigation of the crisis arguably surpasses what either of the previous commercial rights holders might have achieved. Despite this success, there remains considerable scope for further improvement, particularly concerning media rights strategies and maximizing global reach. While 2020 was a year of enforced contraction, Formula 1 is now poised for a season of consolidation, setting the stage for its highly anticipated “new era” in 2022, marked by radical technical and financial regulations. Crucially, the recent earnings call unequivocally underscored that F1’s financial foundations are exceptionally solid, confirming the sport is in robust health, well-fortified against future economic uncertainties and external shocks.
RacingLines
- The year of sprints, ‘the show’ – and rising stock: A political review of the 2021 F1 season
- The problems of perception the FIA must address after the Abu Dhabi row
- Why the budget cap could be F1’s next battleground between Mercedes and Red Bull
- Todt defied expectations as president – now he plans to “disappear” from FIA
- Sir Frank Williams: A personal appreciation of a true racer
Browse all RacingLines columns