As the Formula 1 circus descended upon the iconic Hungaroring circuit, nestled just outside Budapest, the air was thick with more than just the usual anticipation for a Grand Prix weekend. While the controversial Silverstone crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton continued to fuel heated discussions within the paddock, a significant off-track development began to capture the attention of industry insiders: the impending departure of a key FIA figure to helm Audi’s nascent Formula 1 project. This move signaled a potentially seismic shift in the future landscape of the sport, hinting at a new manufacturer entry that could redefine competition in the coming years.
Thursday: Navigating the Paddock and Post-Silverstone Aftermath
Advert | Become a Supporter & go ad-free
My journey to the Hungaroring commenced from a hotel in central Budapest, having arrived the previous afternoon from Brussels. This trip served as a poignant reminder of the evolving dynamics of international travel. Compared to earlier events this season, which I had reached by train or car, air travel has demonstrably picked up pace. However, it’s equally clear that airlines and airports are struggling to scale their operations to meet the surging demand. As global borders continue to reopen, the challenges of air travel are only likely to intensify unless rapid adaptation and significant investment are made across the aviation sector. The sheer volume of passengers and the strain on existing infrastructure suggest that a truly smooth travel experience remains some way off.
Upon my arrival at the circuit, conveniently located approximately a 30-minute drive northeast of the city, I was directed to undergo a mandatory Covid-19 test. This protocol felt particularly stringent, given that I had already been tested the day before, and Hungary itself maintained a completely mask-free policy for its citizens, boasting an impressive vaccination rate with almost 60% of its adult population double-vaccinated. The contrast with Formula E’s recent London round, which welcomed a substantial influx of fans onto its grid, raised a pertinent question: how much longer can Formula 1 genuinely justify its exceptionally stringent testing and ‘bubble’ regimes? The sport’s commitment to safety is admirable, but the disparity with other major events and local regulations highlighted an ongoing debate about proportionality and practicality in a gradually reopening world.
Paddock chatter invariably circled back to the contentious Silverstone crash. Red Bull Racing was reportedly pinning its hopes for a review of the Max Verstappen / Lewis Hamilton incident from the opening lap of the British Grand Prix primarily on comprehensive GPS and telemetry data. This data, partially bolstered by sophisticated simulations, aimed to provide an intricate analysis of Lewis Hamilton’s trajectories during various laps at Silverstone. The team’s strategy was evidently to persuade the stewards that Hamilton’s maneuver was simply a desperate, albeit costly, mistake rather than a deliberate or reckless act. The sheer volume of data being prepared underscored the high stakes involved, with both teams acutely aware of the potential championship implications of the stewards’ final decision.
I couldn’t help but ponder the critical question: how much of this meticulously gathered information would truly be deemed ‘new’ by the FIA stewards, and more importantly, how much would be considered ‘relevant’ to overturn their initial ruling? These are stringent criteria, and merely re-presenting existing evidence in a new format often falls short. If the new data failed to meet these thresholds, a swift verdict was anticipated, likely within hours of the 4pm hearing reaching its conclusion. The tension was palpable, as the outcome could significantly influence the psychological battle between the two championship protagonists and their respective teams.
At precisely two o’clock, I had the privilege of meeting Kimi Raikkonen for an exclusive interview. It was a moment laden with nostalgia, as some two decades prior, I had been the very first journalist to interview him when he made his Formula 1 debut with Sauber. “A long time,” he chuckled, a rare glimpse of warmth from “The Iceman,” as I presented him with a photo from that initial encounter – a perfect icebreaker. Our conversation naturally drifted through the intervening two decades, reflecting on his unparalleled career longevity. During our chat, he revealed a touching detail from his early days: his very first stipend was shared with his parents, a heartfelt gesture of gratitude for their years of sacrifice. He recounted a pivotal family decision when he was just 12 years old: faced with a choice between a new kart for the Finnish championship or their first indoor toilet, his parents prioritised his racing dreams. The new kart, and subsequent contract, effectively curtailed their often-icy outdoor trips, a testament to the dedication that underpins a champion’s journey.
During the official FIA press conference, I found myself particularly impressed by Max Verstappen’s composure. Despite enduring a heavy 51G crash into the Silverstone barriers and the immense disappointment of witnessing his hard-earned championship lead dramatically decimated, he responded to a barrage of loaded questions with remarkable calm and clarity. It’s often easy to overlook his relative youth – he is, after all, only 23 years old – given his exceptional coolness under intense media scrutiny. Verstappen remained unwavering, asserting that he saw no reason to alter his approach to racing. His rival, Lewis Hamilton, echoed a similar sentiment, adamantly stating that nothing would change in his own approach. “I would do the move exactly the way I did it last time,” he affirmed, despite the stewards having found him “predominantly to blame for the accident.” This firm stance from both drivers underscored the fierce competitive spirit defining this championship battle, suggesting that this rivalry was set to intensify and run until the very final race in December, and perhaps even beyond, with the new generation of cars in 2022.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
During a later Dutch-language session, Max Verstappen was in an even better, more relaxed mood. He openly expressed his genuine enjoyment of Budapest, the vibrant city, and the unique characteristics of the Hungaroring. He shared a personal anecdote, revealing that he and his father, Jos Verstappen, occasionally bring their own cars to the circuit simply to “play” – a testament to his pure passion for driving and a rare insight into his connection with this particular venue. This lighthearted moment contrasted sharply with the intense championship pressure, showcasing another dimension of the young driver.
Around six o’clock, news filtered through that the hearing regarding Red Bull’s request for review had concluded. I was informed that the request had been rejected, initiating a prolonged wait for the official stewards’ document. To pass the time and sample local culture, I headed to a charming restaurant in the city with two Hungarian colleagues. I started with a bowl of goulash soup so exquisitely spicy and flavourful that I promptly ordered a second serving, which perfectly rounded off my evening. Later that evening, the official confirmation of the verdict arrived. While it reinforced my suspicion that Red Bull had failed to table any substantially ‘new or relevant’ evidence, it also prompted a broader reflection. I questioned whether the review process itself warranted a review, perhaps with a different set of stewards presiding over the appeal than those who handed down the original verdict, to ensure impartiality and fresh perspectives. Furthermore, in our increasingly electronic and interconnected era, the two-week timeframe for such reviews seemed unnecessarily protracted and could surely be significantly reduced, allowing for quicker resolution and less prolonged uncertainty.
Friday: Crowds, Connections, and Audi’s F1 Ambitions
Arriving at the circuit on Friday, the shift in atmosphere was immediately apparent: the promoters were clearly anticipating a near-full house. Circuit-bound traffic was substantially heavier than the previous day, making the thoughtfully provided ‘F1 personnel’ motorway lane an absolute godsend. I was informed that the circuit operators optimistically expected over 60,000 spectators on Sunday alone, with a total attendance projected to exceed 100,000 over the entire weekend. This palpable energy outside the paddock gates suggested a welcome return to normalcy for major sporting events, a stark contrast to the closed-door races of the previous year.
During my early morning walkabout through the bustling paddock, I had a chance encounter with Vitantonio Liuzzi. The former Red Bull, Toro Rosso, and Force India pilot was serving as a driver steward for the weekend. I had always felt that Liuzzi, despite his evident talent, had somewhat underachieved in Formula 1, primarily due to the competitive limitations of the cars he often drove. It was genuinely pleasing to see him willing to contribute his vast experience back to the sport in a new capacity. He shared insights into his current interests, revealing that he could be tempted by the historic racing scene, though not with the same prolificacy as, say, Emanuele Pirro. “Sometimes I think there are five Pirros out there,” he quipped good-naturedly, “so often do I see his name listed in historic race entries!”
Lewis Hamilton’s arrival around 10 am provided a moment of light amusement. The seven-time world champion appeared bedecked in a helmet and striped overalls, a clever disguise that successfully fooled a number of eager photographers and TV cameramen. Many initially ignored him, their lenses focused on other more overtly recognisable paddock personalities. It was only later, when he was spotted in the same overalls but without his helmet, that they realised the significant figure they had initially overlooked, leading to a flurry of belated photographic activity.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Then came the truly significant revelation of the day, from an absolutely solid and highly credible source: Adam Baker, the FIA’s respected safety director, whose resignation from the governing body had been confirmed during the FIA conference I attended in Monaco after the Austrian Grand Prix double-header, is heading to Audi. His new role will be to direct motorsport strategies for the Volkswagen Group’s luxury subsidiary, a move with profound implications for the world of Formula 1. Baker (pictured middle of top row) is a high achiever with an enviable motorsport curriculum vitae, including a previous tenure as head of race and test for powertrains with BMW during its Formula 1 involvement, alongside holding top DTM (Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters) roles. Crucially, he oversaw the comprehensive investigation into Romain Grosjean’s terrifying fiery accident in Bahrain and was instrumental in implementing the FIA’s global accident database, a critical tool that systematically investigates all serious motorsport incidents worldwide. Incidentally, Max Verstappen’s Silverstone crash is reportedly on the list of incidents slated for analysis by this very database, highlighting the ongoing commitment to safety. Baker’s departure is understood to have received the FIA’s full approval, signalling that this is a mutually beneficial move for all parties. Such a high-profile move strongly indicates that something major is indeed brewing at Audi, suggesting a strategic commitment that extends far beyond casual interest.
My source further elaborated that Baker’s primary and immediate task will be to devise a robust strategy for Audi’s potential entry into Formula 1, most likely as an engine supplier. This strongly suggests that the Four Rings’ board is, at the very least, seriously considering an F1 involvement – even if, as with all ambitious projects, there remains a possibility that it may not ultimately come to fruition. The mere fact that a figure of Baker’s calibre is being brought in to specifically outline this path speaks volumes. This development immediately sparked speculation: could Audi potentially acquire the formidable (ex-Honda) Red Bull Powertrains project, leveraging an established infrastructure and knowledge base to accelerate their entry? Such a move would create a powerful new dynamic on the grid and provide a significant pathway for Audi to make its mark quickly in the sport.
The team principals’ press conference held particular contention given the presence of both Red Bull team principal Christian Horner and his Mercedes counterpart Toto Wolff, especially following their various and often fiery comments exchanged since the Silverstone incident. The intense hype surrounding their appearance made it easy to overlook a crucial detail: while Red Bull’s request for a review – which was their regulatory right – was ultimately rejected, the original verdict that Hamilton was ‘predominantly to blame’ for the accident was firmly re-affirmed by the stewards. No amount of posturing or strategic communication from Mercedes could change that fundamental finding. The discussion, therefore, often felt like a re-litigation of a closed case, albeit one with significant emotional and competitive residue.
I found myself rather concerned by the potential ramifications of comments made in response to my direct question to Mercedes motorsport CEO Toto Wolff. “Is it not concerning that Lewis said that he would do exactly the same next time, particularly given the verdict and the safety angle of that?” I asked, referencing the collision which caused Max Verstappen’s severe 51G crash. Wolff’s reply was direct: “I think he would probably get another 10-second penalty if that is the precedent that the stewards set.” While a direct answer, it subtly implied a concession to the stewards’ authority while simultaneously failing to fully address the core safety implications of Hamilton’s defiant stance. Such an exchange underscored the ongoing tension and philosophical differences between the teams regarding racing conduct at the very limit.
After the second practice session concluded, I embarked on another casual stroll through the paddock. In the process, I spotted Allan McNish, a former Formula 1 driver and, significantly, Audi’s Formula E team boss. McNish boasts a veritable roll-call of motorsport achievements, including a WEC world championship and multiple Le Mans victories, all achieved with Audi. His presence in the Hungary paddock, especially given the earlier revelation about Adam Baker’s appointment at Audi, struck me as more than purely coincidental. It suggested a deeper, strategic connection between Audi’s existing motorsport operations and its emerging Formula 1 ambitions, further adding intrigue to the unfolding narrative of a potential new factory entry. The motorsport world will undoubtedly be staying tuned for further developments.
2021 Hungarian Grand Prix Insights
- Ocon congratulated by past French F1 aces after breakthrough win
- Alpine doubt first win signals a performance breakthrough
- Vettel disqualification hearing to take place on Monday
- Why no one received a Grosjean-style race ban for the Hungarian GP pile-up
- Ocon’s “beautiful” late-stint pace was other key to Alpine’s breakthrough win
Browse all 2021 Hungarian Grand Prix articles