Budkowski: Rear Floor Changes Were Trickier Than Expected

In the latest F1 paddock insights, Alpine executive director Marcin Budkowski has revealed the initial, significant challenge posed by Formula 1’s new rear floor regulations for the 2021 season. Teams universally experienced a substantial performance deficit, with Budkowski estimating a loss of over a second per lap due to these aerodynamic changes.

Support RaceFans and Enjoy an Ad-Free Experience

RaceFans thrives as an independent voice in motorsport journalism, powered significantly by the generous support of its dedicated readers. To ensure the continued development, growth, and high-quality content of this site, we invite you to consider becoming a RaceFans Supporter.

For a modest contribution of just £1 per month, or an annual payment of £12, you can upgrade your account to an exclusive ad-free browsing experience. This not only enhances your enjoyment of our content but also directly contributes to the future of RaceFans. Learn more about the benefits and how to join our community of supporters below:

  • Become a RaceFans Supporter Today
  • RaceFans Supporter FAQ – Your Questions Answered

The Aerodynamic Headaches: Marcin Budkowski on F1’s New Rear Floor Regulations

Marcin Budkowski, a key figure at Alpine F1, offered candid insights into the profound impact of the new rear floor regulations introduced for the 2021 Formula 1 season. These changes, primarily aimed at reducing downforce to control car speeds and potentially enhance safety, presented an immediate and complex challenge for every team on the grid. Budkowski highlighted the universal experience of a significant performance drop, emphasizing that engineers across the paddock were tasked with an intensive recovery mission.

“As every team, we lost a chunk compared to last year due to the changes at the back of the car. Everybody’s been quite busy recovering it. I’m not going to tell you where we ended up exactly, but everybody looks at recovering all of it. We lost over a second a lap to start with, and then obviously we’re recovering and recovering.”

The scale of the initial performance deficit – over a second per lap – underscores the dramatic nature of these seemingly minor aerodynamic adjustments. For F1 teams, where milliseconds can determine grid positions and race outcomes, such a loss requires an all-out effort in design, simulation, and real-world testing to regain precious lap time.

“It’s a challenging area because when you touch an area like the rear corner, you get into correlation issues usually between the CFD, the tunnel, and the track. I don’t think it was intentional, actually, from the FIA to pose that extra challenge. But I think it was maybe a slightly unintended effect of these rules; it proved trickier than we expected initially. It’s not just the piece of floor missing; it’s actually quite a bit of a headache as well on top of it.”

Budkowski’s comments illuminate the multi-faceted engineering headache created by the new rules. The rear floor and diffuser area are incredibly sensitive components of an F1 car’s aerodynamics, crucial for generating downforce and managing airflow. Any alteration to this region ripples through the entire aerodynamic package, affecting balance, stability, and overall performance. The challenge is compounded by the perennial “correlation issues” between Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, wind tunnel testing, and the car’s actual behaviour on the track. Achieving perfect correlation is a holy grail for F1 engineers, and regulatory changes often exacerbate these discrepancies, forcing teams to painstakingly refine their understanding and models.

“It makes it interesting, you can see there’s different solutions on different cars. It’s usually the case when you have a new regulation that I’m sure is going to converge; it’s already converged during the test. So we’ve been doing some testing there, as a lot of other teams. We’ve had good results, good direction, good understanding – obviously, correlation is challenging there, but no surprise that not only we’ve gained some understanding, but we’ve improved performance of the car.”

Despite the initial difficulties, the competitive spirit of Formula 1 ensures that teams rapidly converge on optimal solutions. Budkowski noted the emergence of varied design philosophies across different cars, a common sight during the early stages of a new regulatory cycle. However, he also observed that a degree of convergence was already evident during pre-season testing, highlighting the speed and efficiency with which F1’s engineering minds adapt. For Alpine, these efforts have yielded positive outcomes, indicating progress in understanding and improving the car’s performance. The continuous pursuit of aerodynamic efficiency remains paramount, and overcoming challenges like the rear floor regulations is a testament to the ingenuity that defines Formula 1.

Quotes: Dieter Rencken

Around the Paddock: Essential Motor Racing News and Insights

Beyond the technical intricacies of F1 regulations, the world of motor racing continues to buzz with exciting developments, driver movements, and championship battles. Here’s a round-up of other compelling stories from across the motorsport landscape:

Advert | Become a Supporter & go ad-free

Fernando Alonso: Two-time world champion is back racing in Formula 1 (BBC)

The return of Fernando Alonso to Formula 1 with Alpine was one of the most anticipated storylines of the season. The two-time world champion, known for his fierce competitiveness and uncompromising confidence, didn’t shy away from self-belief in a BBC interview. When questioned about his standing among contemporaries like Hamilton, Vettel, Räikkönen, and Verstappen, Alonso famously retorted, “No, I’m better.” This bold statement encapsulates the confidence and winning mentality that fans have come to expect from the Spanish veteran, setting the stage for an exciting comeback season where he aimed to prove his continued prowess in the pinnacle of motorsport.

Nissan becomes the latest manufacturer to commit to Gen3 era of Formula E (Formula E)

Formula E continues to attract and retain major automotive manufacturers, with Nissan reaffirming its long-term commitment to the all-electric racing series. The Japanese giant announced its participation through to the end of Season 12 (2025-2026), solidifying its presence since joining in Season 5 as the sole Japanese manufacturer. This commitment is particularly significant as it extends into the Gen3 era of the championship, set to commence in Season 9 (2022-23). The Gen3 cars promise to be even more powerful and faster, pushing the boundaries of electric racing technology and showcasing Nissan’s dedication to innovation and sustainable mobility through high-performance competition.

Bahrain Grand Prix Preview (Williams)

The Williams Racing team provided their preview for the Bahrain Grand Prix, marking the start of a new F1 season with renewed optimism. Following a condensed pre-season testing schedule that saw drivers with limited track time, the excitement within the team was palpable. Their preview highlighted the immense effort by everyone at the factory and trackside to prepare the cars for competition. With only one day per driver in the car during testing, the Bahrain Grand Prix offered the first true test of their progress and capabilities, setting the tone for their ambitions in the new era for the historic British outfit.

Brundle and Hill expect Verstappen to challenge Hamilton for F1 title (The Guardian)

The prospect of a genuine championship battle between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton generated immense buzz ahead of the 2021 season. Renowned F1 pundits Martin Brundle and Damon Hill openly voiced their expectations for Verstappen to mount a strong challenge against the reigning champion. Their analysis was fueled by observations from pre-season testing, where the Red Bull looked particularly strong. Brundle pointed to rare instances of Hamilton making uncharacteristic mistakes—like a stricken car in a gravel trap or a spin on cold tires—as signs that perhaps the Mercedes dominance was not as absolute. This widespread anticipation set the stage for what many hoped would be a closely fought title showdown, injecting fresh excitement into the championship narrative.

Michael Schumacher’s legacy pressure will be no issue for son Mick (The Express)

The debut of Mick Schumacher in Formula 1 with Haas brought with it the immense legacy of his seven-time world champion father, Michael Schumacher. Despite the inevitable comparisons and pressures, many within the sport believed Mick’s talent would allow him to navigate this challenge successfully. The Express reported on sentiments suggesting that his F2 championship victory was clear proof of his inherent talent, affirming his place in F1 on merit. While acknowledging Michael as a generational talent, the focus was placed on Mick forging his own path, demonstrating that raw skill and championship pedigree were the true drivers behind his F1 opportunity, rather than simply his iconic surname.

FIA Girls On Track – Rising Stars gathers even greater momentum (FIA)

The FIA’s “Girls On Track – Rising Stars” programme continued to gain significant momentum, reinforcing its commitment to fostering female talent in motorsport. The FIA Women in Motorsport Commission proudly announced an extended agreement with Ferrari, creating potential pathways for up to four female drivers to join the prestigious Ferrari Driver Academy (FDA). Further bolstering the initiative, Deborah Mayer’s inspiring Iron Dames project, dedicated to promoting women in motorsport, officially became a main partner. These collaborations not only provide invaluable support and opportunities but also signify a growing recognition and investment in nurturing the next generation of female racing stars, aiming for greater diversity and inclusion in the sport.

We always endeavour to credit original sources. If you have a tip for a link to feature in the next RaceFans round-up, please send it in via the contact form.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

Social Media Highlights

A look at notable posts and discussions from across social media platforms:

An Instagram post by Mike Beuttler, captured in a striking image of him walking back to the pits at Monza in ’73 after a gearbox failure in his March 731. This poignant photo accompanied a tribute to Beuttler, who is one of only three LGBTQ+ drivers to have started an F1 Grand Prix. He tragically passed away from HIV/AIDS in ’88 at the age of 48. The post served as a powerful reminder of diversity within the sport and the “We Race As One” initiative’s broader message of inclusion.

Today in Bahrain I’m wearing a T-shirt bearing a pic of Mike Beuttler walking back to the pits at Monza in ’73, after his March 731’s gearbox failed. Beuttler is one of only 3 #LGBTQ+ drivers to have started an #F1 GP. He died of #HIV/#AIDS in ’88, aged 48. #RIP #WeRaceAsOne pic.twitter.com/Ey0JIB1iee

— Matt Bishop 🏳️‍🌈 🏁 (@TheBishF1) March 24, 2021

  • For more official F1 accounts and key figures to follow, explore the F1 Twitter Directory.

Comment of the Day: The F1 Anti-Dilution Fee Debate

Following former team owner Eddie Jordan’s outspoken comments that a $200 million anti-dilution fee for new Formula 1 teams would render his own past entry unviable, the debate surrounding equitable distribution and barriers to entry continues to resonate within the F1 community. Reader Carl Parker (Mysticarl) offered a thought-provoking solution to this contentious issue:

“Pretty simple solution – they should work out how many cars max they ever want on the grid, and divide the prize money including any ‘missing’ teams. That way no existing team ‘loses out’ when a new one comes in.”

“What they do with the money in the mean time could be things like charity, grass-roots investment, etc. I’m sure they could figure something out.”

“I do think new teams should have to prove they are ‘ready’ for the challenge of entering F1, but a fee like that is crazy.”

“Not sure about some of the other points EJ mentions though.
@Mysticarl

Carl Parker’s insightful comment cuts to the heart of the matter, suggesting a model that protects existing teams’ financial interests without creating an insurmountable barrier for new entrants. The anti-dilution fee was ostensibly put in place to compensate existing teams for the dilution of prize money and commercial rights revenue if a new team joins the grid. However, critics like Jordan argue that such a high fee stifles competition and innovation by making F1 inaccessible to genuinely ambitious but less well-funded prospective teams. Parker’s proposal offers a creative compromise, ensuring that prize money distribution accounts for a full grid even if some slots are empty, thus allowing the F1 administration to channel surplus funds into beneficial areas like grassroots motorsport development or charitable initiatives, rather than hoarding them or using them as a prohibitive entry toll. This perspective champions a balanced approach: new teams must demonstrate readiness and sustainability, but not be subjected to a ‘crazy’ fee that prioritizes short-term gain over the long-term health and growth of the sport.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free

Happy Birthday!

Wishing a very happy birthday to Guilherme Teixeira, Marc, Thomas Lindgren, and Thomas Lindgren! We hope you have a fantastic day celebrating.

If you’d like a birthday shout-out in our daily round-up, please let us know your birth date via the contact form or by adding it to our list here.

On This Day in F1 History

  • 10 years ago today (March 25, 2011):Practice commenced for the highly anticipated first race of the new Formula 1 season in Melbourne. However, the Lotus team suffered an immediate setback when Karun Chandhok, on his very first lap out of the pits, experienced a significant crash. This unfortunate incident highlighted the unforgiving nature of F1, even during initial shakedowns, and presented an early challenge for Lotus as they aimed to establish themselves in the competitive field.