Williams 1.8 Seconds Faster With Experimental Losail Setup

In a dramatic turn of events at the recent Qatar Grand Prix, the Williams Racing team defied all expectations, with both Carlos Sainz Jnr and his teammate securing top-10 qualifying positions. This unexpected surge in performance was largely attributed to an “experimental” set-up championed by Sainz, which allowed the team to unlock previously unseen potential from their car on a circuit where they had historically struggled.

Williams’ Remarkable Turnaround: A Deep Dive into 2024 Qatar Performance

Just twelve months prior, the Losail International Circuit had been a venue of significant despair for Williams. The team languished at the very bottom of the performance charts at the Qatar Grand Prix in 2023. Both their drivers failed to progress beyond Q1, with Alexander Albon starting the main race from a lowly 16th place and Franco Colapinto even further back in 19th. This stark contrast underscores the magnitude of their 2024 achievement. While Williams typically ranked as the ninth-fastest team on average in the previous season, their outing at Losail was particularly dire, showcasing a conspicuous lack of pace compared to their rivals. Ironically, teams like Sauber, who also endured a challenging 2023 campaign, found a glimmer of success in Qatar, securing their only points finish of that year, highlighting Losail’s unique ability to expose or reward specific car characteristics.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

The Losail circuit is known for its flowing, medium-to-high-speed corners, a characteristic that often puts a premium on aerodynamic efficiency and stable chassis performance. For a team like Williams, whose FW47 chassis had known weaknesses in these specific areas, a repeat of their 2023 struggles seemed almost inevitable. Sainz himself articulated these concerns prior to the practice sessions, predicting a challenging weekend. He detailed how the track’s dominant corner profiles, ranging from 150 to 200 kph, in fourth, fifth, and sixth gears, directly exacerbated the car’s inherent deficiencies. “Every track we go to,” he explained, “we see the GPS data and we tend to be one of the slowest cars or one of the slowest teams. And in Qatar, you only have those corners.” This candid assessment painted a bleak picture, suggesting that the team would require “something magical in terms of set-up” to even contend for a respectable position.

Unlocking Hidden Potential: The Experimental Setup Explained

What unfolded, however, was indeed nothing short of magical. The team, perhaps with an inkling of the potential they had cultivated, decided to diverge from their conventional setup philosophy. This bold move, which Sainz later confirmed involved running a car setup they “would never run or haven’t run pretty much all year,” proved to be a masterstroke. The chosen configuration was specifically adapted to the unique demands of the Losail circuit’s corners, aiming to mitigate the FW47’s inherent weaknesses and capitalize on its strengths. This kind of experimental approach in Formula 1 involves myriad adjustments, from suspension geometry and ride height to aerodynamic balance and differential settings, all finely tuned to extract optimal performance from the car under specific conditions. It’s a high-risk, high-reward strategy that requires meticulous data analysis, courageous engineering decisions, and unwavering driver feedback.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

The results of this brave experimentation were immediately evident during sprint race qualifying. While a couple of teams actually lapped slower than the previous year, and most others showed modest improvements – Red Bull by a mere thousandth of a second, Aston Martin by a more substantial 0.758 seconds – Williams demonstrated a monumental leap forward. Their gain was over a second greater than any other team, highlighting a significant step change in performance. Sainz’s impressive lap of 1’20.542 for the sprint race placed his car on the fourth row of the grid, a staggering 1.8 seconds faster than the team’s best effort at the same venue the previous year. This dramatic improvement wasn’t just a one-off; it was consistent from the very first practice session. “We were much quicker than expected this weekend, right from the off in FP1,” Sainz remarked, clearly encouraged by the car’s surprising pace. He added, “I’m quite encouraged to see the car performing at a good level this weekend. We expected to be almost out in Q1, we actually [had] both cars in [S]Q3 for the first time in a while. So I’m encouraged by that.” Getting both cars into the final sprint qualifying session (SQ3) for the first time in an extended period was a significant morale booster and a testament to the effectiveness of their new approach.

Despite this resounding success, the Williams car continued to exhibit one of its enduring traits: a preference for harder tire compounds. Sainz noted, “We’re much quicker on the mediums than on softs. Like always with our car, we seem to be better with the harder compounds.” This characteristic has strategic implications for both qualifying and the main race. While softer tires typically offer more grip and faster lap times over a short burst, the Williams chassis appears to extract more consistent performance and perhaps better temperature management from the medium and hard compounds. This was evident in the qualifying sessions, where Sainz was nearly P1 on hard tires in FP1 and comfortably in the top five on mediums in Q2. However, when the soft tires were fitted for SQ3, other teams found significantly more lap time, diminishing Williams’ relative advantage. Nevertheless, an P8 finish, just half a tenth off P5, underscored the immense progress made and highlighted the fine margins in Formula 1. Sainz recognized this, acknowledging that “we know there’s half a tenth there to find for tomorrow that could give us a much better track position for the race.” This attention to minute details and the continuous pursuit of marginal gains are hallmarks of competitive F1 racing.

Sainz further elaborated on the success of the experimental setup, emphasizing its importance not just for immediate performance but also for the team’s long-term learning and development. “We’ve gone a bit experimental with set-up this weekend and we’ve decided to run a car that we would never run or we haven’t run pretty much all year,” he reiterated. “And it’s just adapted to this style of corner and it seems like the car is working. So I’m glad that the team keeps experimenting, we keep pushing. Also for me as a learning point of view, when I push a team to try radically different set-ups or some big differences, I feel like I learn a lot from the car and the team and the way the team and the car responds. This weekend so far is a positive experiment in that sense.” This insight highlights the symbiotic relationship between driver and engineer, where a driver’s willingness to push boundaries in testing and setup choices can lead to profound understanding and significant performance breakthroughs for the entire team. Such successful experiments can provide crucial data and direction for future car development, potentially unlocking performance at other circuits with similar characteristics or informing the design philosophy of future iterations of the FW chassis.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Teammate Dynamics and the Margins of F1

Beyond Williams’ remarkable performance, the sprint race qualifying session offered another significant talking point: it marked the first time all year that reigning world champion Max Verstappen was out-qualified by a teammate. Yuki Tsunoda, in a spirited display, managed to pip Verstappen by an astonishingly slim margin of just nine thousandths of a second. This incredibly tight battle underscores the intense competition within Formula 1 and the often razor-thin differences that separate drivers, even those at the pinnacle of the sport. Verstappen’s last defeat by a teammate in qualifying occurred at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix last year, when Sergio Perez outpaced him. Such instances, though rare for a driver of Verstappen’s caliber, serve as a potent reminder of the constant pressure and the relentless pursuit of perfection required in F1, even from within one’s own garage. It also highlights the growing strength and maturity of drivers like Tsunoda, who are increasingly capable of challenging the established order. These internal team battles, especially when they involve a championship leader, add an extra layer of intrigue and demonstrate the inherent competitive nature that defines Formula 1.

Go ad-free for just £1 per month>> Find out more and sign up

2025 Qatar Grand Prix Related Articles

• Norris wins 2025 F1 title and ends Verstappen’s four-year reign as champion
• McLaren “helping Stefano with TV ratings” with Qatar strategy error, jokes Brown
• Alpine are guaranteed to finish last in 2025 – but will set an obscure points record
• Norris take note: The F1 points leader usually loses three-way title fights
• Mercedes grateful for Red Bull’s statement on Antonelli after “disappointing” online abuse

Browse all 2025 Qatar Grand Prix articles