Miami Grand Prix: Unraveling the Williams Team Order Controversy Between Albon and Sainz

A Race of Contrasts: Jubilation and Frustration Under the Miami Sun

The Miami Grand Prix delivered a rollercoaster of emotions for the Williams Racing team, culminating in their best result of the season so far. While one driver, Alexander Albon, was positively jubilant, celebrating a hard-fought performance that saw him battling within sight of the podium throughout the entire race, his teammate, Carlos Sainz Jnr, found himself mired in deep frustration. The source of Sainz’s unhappiness stemmed from a controversial on-track incident where Albon passed him, seemingly in defiance of a perceived pre-race agreement or instruction to hold position.

The tension escalated during the race when Sainz, feeling the pressure and seeking support, requested clarification from his race engineer, Gaetan Jego. Jego responded with a concise, “Alex has been instructed.” However, moments later, as Albon cleanly executed an overtake at Turn 11, Sainz’s frustration boiled over. His radio crackled with a pointed retort: “You told me he’s been told!” Jego could only offer a sympathetic “I know” and urged his driver, “I know. Let’s be the bigger one, okay?”

Sainz’s discontent persisted well beyond the checkered flag. He made his feelings explicitly clear to team principal James Vowles, highlighting the potential breach of trust and the impact on his race. The incident raised critical questions about team cohesion, driver trust, and the interpretation of team orders in the heat of competition. Was Albon within his rights to reclaim a position after being passed earlier in the race, or was Sainz justified in his belief that an instruction had been disregarded? To fully understand this complex dynamic, we must dissect the critical moments as they unfolded, listening to the very words exchanged between drivers and their engineers.

Radio Messages: Unpacking the Critical Moments of the Albon-Sainz Incident

The following key radio communications reveal the intricate details and rising tensions that characterized the race for both Alexander Albon and Carlos Sainz:

• “I touched with Alex”
• “Remember what we discussed”
• “Check front-right tyre quickly”
• “What’s the plan here because we’re just losing time?”
• “You told me he’s been told”
• “You made me lose three-tenths extra”
• “I’ve lost a lot of confidence here”

“I touched with Alex”: An Early Scare Sets the Tone

The Miami Grand Prix threatened to end prematurely and disappointingly for both Williams drivers. In the chaotic opening lap, as the pack jostled for position, Sainz had to take swift evasive action at Turn 3 when another competitor, Lando Norris, rejoined the track just ahead of him. In the ensuing scramble, Sainz made contact with his teammate, Albon, who was simultaneously navigating the outside line. This was a heart-stopping moment for the team, as initial contact, even minor, can often lead to significant and race-ending damage, especially to delicate aerodynamic components or suspension.

Fortunately for Williams, both drivers managed to avoid serious damage. However, the incident immediately injected a palpable sense of anxiety into both cockpits. The critical question became the integrity of their cars, particularly their tires and aerodynamics. In a sport where fractions of a second and millimeter-perfect precision dictate performance, even the slightest compromise can unravel a race strategy. The initial radio messages reflected this immediate concern, as both drivers sought reassurance from their respective engineering teams.

Lap: 1/57 ALB: 1’38.782, SAI: 1’39.731
Albon	Just check for damage, rear-right.	Sainz	I touched with Alex.
Urwin	Tyres are okay, aero is okay. Looks okay from our side.	Sainz	Check front left.
		Jego	We’re checking, you’re good on front-left. Checking front wing.
		Jego	Need an update on the front wing.
		Sainz	Happy. All good.
		Jego	Pressures still okay. Front wing okay on our side. There’s a yellow flag, turn one, potentially debris. Potential debris, one, into turn one, turn four. Norris ahead 0.4, another car behind 0.6. We’re still on the same race.
Lap: 2/57 ALB: 1’53.640, SAI: 1’55.407
Albon	Have a look over the pit wall, I’ll come close to you.	Sainz	I feel very low, low rear grip.
Urwin	Yeah, copy that. Still VSC. Albon does not drive close to the pit wall as he passes	Jego	VSC, VSC. Go AC, go AC. Stay out, stay out. A competitor stopped right hand side turn 14. Work the front and repeat your feedback, please.
		Sainz	Yeah I felt very low rear grip.
Lap: 3/57 ALB: 2’03.540, SAI: 2’01.936
		Jego	Competitor’s car is going behind the barrier now, I’ll let you know. Expect rain around lap 12, VSC ending, VSC ending. Go race, restart around braking zone turn 17. It’s okay for the restart. Restart, restart, DRS enabled. Norris 0.6, another car 1.2.

Despite the initial all-clear, Sainz continued to report issues, specifically a “very low rear grip,” indicating that even minor contact or the aggressive nature of the opening lap had perhaps unsettled his car’s balance. These early moments, fraught with potential disaster, set a tense precedent for the race, hinting at the difficult team dynamics that would soon emerge.

“Remember what we discussed”: The Pre-Race Pact and its Immediate Test

Having initially dropped behind Alexander Albon at the start, Carlos Sainz’s race engineer, Gaetan Jego, quickly prompted him with a cryptic but significant reminder: “Remember what we discussed this morning.” This message clearly alluded to a pre-race agreement, a strategic understanding between the teammates and the pit wall, likely pertaining to how they would manage their positions on track, particularly if one found themselves behind the other. The exact nature of this agreement—whether it involved holding position, a pre-planned swap, or a specific window for overtakes—remained unstated over the radio, but its implications were immediately clear.

Shortly after this communication, Sainz executed a pass on Albon. This initial maneuver, seemingly in line with the “discussed” strategy, appeared to settle the immediate pecking order within the Williams camp. However, even as Sainz moved ahead, Albon’s concerns about his car’s condition persisted. The contact in the opening lap continued to weigh on his mind, manifesting as handling issues that undermined his confidence and pace. His engineer, Urwin, reiterated that visual checks from the pit wall indicated no major damage, yet a driver’s feel for the car often trumps remote diagnostics. This divergence in driver feedback—Sainz keen to push, Albon cautious about car performance—began to lay the groundwork for future disagreements.

Lap: 4/57 ALB: 1’33.079, SAI: 1’32.521
		Jego	Alex first car ahead 0.8. Remember that’s our race. Second car, remember what we discussed this morning. Another car 1.2.
Lap: 5/57 ALB: 1’33.836, SAI: 1’32.332
Albon	Are we sure we don’t have damage?	Jego	On that rain it will hit turn 17 first. Sainz passes Albon approaching turn 11
Urwin	Looks okay on our side. We took photos from the pit wall. Sainz passes Albon approaching turn 11	Jego	No overtake available. Gap at 0.9, Norris ahead 0.9. with DRS.
Urwin	Suggest green three-10. Feedback on what you feel, try and help.
Albon	I feel oversteer, understeer. Honestly, not really that clear to me.
Lap: 6/57 ALB: 1’33.206, SAI: 1’33.317
		Jego	Closing lap five. 52 to go…
		Sainz	Interrupting Less radio Gaetan. Leave it to me, please.

Sainz’s curt instruction to his engineer, “Less radio Gaetan. Leave it to me, please,” reflected his desire for focus and perhaps a hint of frustration with the ongoing communication. While this might seem minor, in the high-stakes environment of Formula 1, such exchanges can reveal underlying pressure and a driver’s state of mind, setting the stage for more heated discussions later in the race.

“Check front-right tyre quickly”: Brushing the Barrier and a Moment of Relief

Carlos Sainz’s Miami Grand Prix weekend had already been marked by a significant mishap a day earlier, when he crashed out of the sprint race after hitting the barrier at Turn 14. In the grand prix, the Spaniard flirted with danger once again, pushing the limits of the challenging street circuit. This time, he clipped the wall at the exit of Turn 12, an incident that could easily have replicated his previous misfortune or worse. The immediate concern for the team was whether the contact had compromised the integrity of his car, particularly the crucial front-right tire and suspension components.

Fortunately for Sainz and the Williams team, he emerged from the glancing blow unscathed. The swift checks by his engineer, Gaetan Jego, confirmed that the front-right tire pressures remained stable and the front wing appeared undamaged. This was a significant moment of relief, allowing Sainz to continue his aggressive push. On street circuits like Miami, the margins for error are minuscule, and even the slightest brush against the unforgiving concrete can spell the end of a race. Sainz’s ability to recover and continue without visible performance degradation underscored his skill but also highlighted the immense pressure and risk drivers undertake at every corner. This incident also served as a subtle reminder of Sainz’s aggressive driving style, which, while capable of yielding strong results, also carries inherent risks.

Lap: 7/57 ALB: 1’32.982, SAI: 1’33.029
		Sainz	Sainz appears to glance the barrier on the inside at the exit of turn 12 Check front-right tyre quickly. Front-right, check.
		Jego	Front right currently okay, pressure’s okay. Remember another competitor ahead on hard. Still happy with the front wing. Front-right pressure’s still okay.
Lap: 8/57 ALB: 1’33.117, SAI: 1’33.230
		Jego	Closing lap seven, 50 to go. Pressures are okay.
Lap: 11/57 ALB: 1’33.569, SAI: 1’33.652
Albon	Closing on Sainz Early overtake available. Does not have DRS.	Jego	Sainz closes on another competitor at turn 17 Don’t have any other overtake available.
		Sainz	Another competitor moving under braking.
		Jego	Okay.

The race continued with intense battles, illustrating the tight competition even mid-pack. Sainz’s reports of another competitor “moving under braking” highlighted the aggressive defensive tactics employed, further increasing the mental strain on the drivers. These moments of high-tension racing were steadily building towards the flashpoint between the two Williams teammates.

“What’s the plan here because we’re just losing time?”: Strategy and Growing Disagreement

A significant factor contributing to the escalating tension between the Williams drivers was their differing tire strategies. Alexander Albon had started the race on a fresh set of medium compound tires, providing him with optimal grip and performance. In contrast, Carlos Sainz was running on a used set, a consequence of an apparent error by the team during the sprint race, where his last fresh set was fitted prematurely. This disparity in tire condition inevitably led to a performance differential as the race progressed. After lap 10, Sainz began to drop back from a competitor, George Russell, and crucially, Albon, on his fresher rubber, started to rapidly close the gap.

This evolving situation triggered urgent radio messages from both drivers, each expressing their perspective and putting pressure on the pit wall. Albon, sensing his superior pace and the strategic advantage of his tires, inquired about the team’s plan, clearly hinting at the possibility of a position swap. He articulated his concern that by remaining behind Sainz, they were collectively “losing time” to their rivals, a critical consideration in Formula 1 where every tenth counts. He also reported losing battery power, a direct consequence of being stuck in dirty air behind his teammate, which hinders energy recovery and overall performance.

Sainz, on the other hand, interpreted the situation differently. As Albon drew within striking distance and began to pressure him, Sainz actively defended his position. His radio messages implored the team to “go forward” and for both cars to “get into our rhythm,” subtly implying that the current order should be maintained and that internal battles were counterproductive. He even requested “a bit of help from Alex,” suggesting Albon should hold station behind him. This contrasting communication from the drivers placed the pit wall in a difficult position, forcing them to weigh individual performance against overall team strategy and a pre-race understanding.

Lap: 12/57 ALB: 1’33.515, SAI: 1’33.379
Urwin	We’re going to get low in the pack.	Sainz	Starts defending from Albon Let’s go forward, guys. We’re compromised in the race here. Let’s get into our rhythm.
Albon	Looks at Sainz at turn 11, who defends Can we just wait because…
Urwin	Yeah, let’s get the pack back…
Albon	We’re losing battery here.
Urwin	Yeah, copy, pack’s low. Another car 0.8 behind. Try and get the anti where we can. Radio’s on. Yeah, copy.
Lap: 13/57 ALB: 1’33.031, SAI: 1’33.044
Albon	What’s the plan here because we’re just losing time?	Jego	Agreed, and being discussed. Closing lap 12, 45 to go.
Urwin	Yeah I’m working on it, and on the weather as well.	Jego	Alex 0.7. Another competitor last lap 32.8.
		Jego	Feedback on tyres and flap.
		Sainz	Yeah, my front-right is obviously down on grip. But the rest of the tyres are fine, it’s just the front-right.
		Jego	Feedback on flap when you can.
		Sainz	I could do with a bit of help from Alex.

This critical juncture highlighted the inherent conflict in modern Formula 1: the balance between maximizing individual car performance and adhering to broader team objectives. Sainz’s feedback about his front-right tire’s grip further validated his defensive stance, while Albon’s relentless pursuit underscored his belief that his fresher tires and superior pace should be utilized for the benefit of the team, suggesting a swap was necessary to optimize their collective race result. The stage was set for the direct confrontation that would follow.

“You told me he’s been told”: The Overtake and its Fiery Aftermath

To Carlos Sainz’s evident and mounting frustration, Alexander Albon executed an overtake moments after Sainz had requested his teammate’s “help.” This pass directly contradicted Sainz’s understanding of the pre-race agreement and the recent radio instruction, leading to an immediate and heated reaction. Just prior to the overtake, Albon’s engineer, Urwin, had warned him about a developing “water pressure issue,” a potentially critical problem that could compromise his race. This technical concern, however, inadvertently provided a compelling rationale for Albon to push past Sainz: gaining clear air ahead of his teammate was crucial for cooling the engine and potentially alleviating the water pressure problem, thus protecting the car and its performance.

As Albon moved ahead at Turn 11, Sainz’s voice crackled over the radio, laced with disbelief and anger: “You told me he’s been told.” This was not merely a complaint but a direct challenge to his engineer, Jego, implying a breach of trust and a failure of the team to manage the situation as promised. Jego, caught between his driver’s raw emotion and the complex realities of race management, attempted to placate Sainz. He urged him to keep his “head down” and “be clever,” reminding him of the DRS advantage and the need to manage energy. The situation vividly illustrated the immense pressure on race engineers, who must not only manage technical parameters but also act as psychologists, guiding their drivers through intense emotional moments. The immediate consequence was a tangible dip in Sainz’s morale, which would continue to affect his performance and perception of the race.

Lap: 14/57 ALB: 1’32.701, SAI: 1’33.614
Urwin	Alright, Alex, we’re managing a water pressure issue with you. You need to maintain a gap of at least a second for the car ahead, short term.	Jego	You are mode six level. Alex has been instructed. Gap 0.5. Another competitor last lap, 32.8. Rain is slowing down, may miss us. Albon passes Sainz at turn 11
Albon	I’m about to overtake him, so…	Sainz	You told me he’s been told.
Urwin	Okay, come on then. Albon passes Sainz at turn 11	Jego	Okay. Let’s have head down. Use DRS, another car one. Be clever. 44 to go.
Lap: 15/57 ALB: 1’32.968, SAI: 1’33.538
		Jego	Clever. Stay within DRS, please.
		Sainz	Yeah but come on.
		Jego	I know, I know. I know, I know. Let’s be the bigger one, okay?
		Jego	Another car one-zero without DRS.
		Jego	Mode seven and use anti as you are within DRS to recharge. Mode seven and use anti. Another car 1.1, no DRS.

The team’s decision-making in these critical seconds was evidently a tightrope walk, balancing Albon’s immediate technical issues and potential performance advantage against Sainz’s strategic expectations and current track position. The engineer’s repeated plea to Sainz – “Let’s be the bigger one” – underscored the team’s desire to move past the contentious moment and refocus on the collective race, yet it did little to assuage Sainz’s growing dissatisfaction.

“You made me lose three-tenths extra”: Track Limits and Further Frustration

Carlos Sainz’s frustrations were not limited to the internal team dynamics; they were compounded by interactions with race control regarding track limits. During Lap 16, Sainz cut the Turn 14-15 chicane, an aggressive maneuver often used to gain time but subject to strict regulations. He was swiftly notified by his engineer, Gaetan Jego, about a “first strike” for track limits at Turn 15. While Sainz believed he had sufficiently backed off, particularly at the exit of Turn 16, to avoid a penalty—a technique known as “lift and coast” to deliberately lose time—the team’s interpretation, or perhaps a directive from race control, differed.

Jego instructed Sainz to lose a specific amount of time, three-tenths of a second, to close his gap to a competitor, Charles Leclerc, and bring it back to 1.5 seconds. This instruction, designed to avoid a penalty from the stewards, further irked Sainz. His reply, “You made me lose three-tenths extra. I already backed off in 16,” encapsulated his feeling of being unfairly penalized twice – once by the track limits violation and then again by the team’s seemingly overly cautious approach. This incident, following closely on the heels of the Albon overtake, added another layer of exasperation for Sainz. It underscored the cumulative mental toll of a challenging race and the feeling that events were conspiring against him, eroding his confidence in the team’s management of his race.

Lap: 16/57 SAI: 1’32.915
Jego	Sainz cuts the chicane at turn 14-15 Another competitor 1.8, I think he made a mistake, his last lap 33.4. Another competitor still in 32.8.
Lap: 17/57 SAI: 1’32.857
Jego	‘Track limit, first strike, then 15, one-five, turn 15 track limit first strike.
Jego	Another competitor 1.8, closing lap 17, 40 to go.
Lap: 18/57 SAI: 1’33.257
Jego	Okay Carlos, can you please lose three tenths to your gap to another competitor following that cutting the chicane. Another competitor gap 1.8, let’s bring that back to 1.5 please.
Sainz	Yeah, I backed off at the exit of 16 when I cut 15. The stewards should look at it. But I’m doing a big [lift and coast].
Jego	We’d like to do more. Lose another three tenths in that section, please. Three tenths. Another competitor currently, 1.9. You have the pace to stay ahead.
Sainz	Okay now.
Jego	Gap 1.6, gap 1.6, thank you.
Sainz	You made me lose three-tenths extra. I already backed off in 16.
Lap: 19/57 SAI: 1’32.546
Jego	Another competitor, 1.8, you’re quicker than him, it was 33.0. Alex, 32.6.

Despite his internal battles, Sainz impressively regained a position ahead of a competitor following a Virtual Safety Car period. However, another VSC period saw him lose that hard-won place, along with another to a different competitor, Lewis Hamilton. These swings of fortune further underscored the turbulent nature of his race, filled with highs and lows, and ultimately contributing to his post-race sentiment.

Lap: 29/57 SAI: 2’05.347
Jego	As close to the delta as possible, another competitor pit under VSC.
Sainz	He will come out ahead, no?
Jego	Safety car ending, restart, exit of turn 17, go ‘race’ now, get ready for restart, all the pace you can.
Jego	Go ‘race’, go ‘race’, green green green green, go ‘race’. Another competitor emerges from the pits ahead of him.
Lap: 30/57 SAI: 1’31.546
Jego	More energy. Sainz passes another competitor on the inside of turn one
Lap: 31/57 SAI: 1’32.773
Jego	Another competitor 0.6, turn on the pack. It’s only to turn 11.

“I’ve lost a lot of confidence here”: Post-Race Reflections and Team Principal’s Intervention

As the checkered flag waved over the Miami Grand Prix, the contrasting emotions within the Williams garage were palpable. For Alexander Albon, the race was a triumph, culminating in a well-deserved fifth-place finish, his second of the year. His engineer, Urwin, celebrated the “lovely job” and how it “makes up for yesterday,” referring to a previous setback. Albon’s exuberant “Go on! Yes!” perfectly captured his satisfaction, acknowledging the team’s progress and his strong performance.

However, the atmosphere on Carlos Sainz’s side of the garage was starkly different. Despite finishing P9 and contributing points to the team, Sainz was deeply unhappy. His initial post-race radio message accused another driver of “moving a bit under braking,” a potential violation of racing rules, further highlighting his perceived misfortunes. More significantly, his raw frustration erupted with an emotional declaration: “That’s not how I go racing, guys. I don’t care. I’ve lost a lot of confidence here on everything.” This wasn’t just a complaint about a single incident, but a profound expression of distrust and disappointment, encompassing the entire race and the team’s handling of the situation.

Williams Team Principal James Vowles swiftly stepped in to address the tension. While congratulating Albon on his impressive drive and highlighting the team’s strong performance, he also directly acknowledged Sainz’s concerns. “Yeah Carlos noted. We’ll discuss this in the room but I agree with you we need proper engagement on it,” Vowles stated, indicating that the team principal understood the gravity of Sainz’s feelings and promised a thorough internal review. He also commended Sainz for “picking up points” despite “damage to the car,” attempting to validate his effort and mitigate some of the frustration. This immediate acknowledgment from Vowles was crucial in managing driver morale and preventing further erosion of team cohesion, emphasizing the importance of open communication and accountability within the team.

Chequered flag
Urwin	Alright there buddy, P5, lovely job.	Sainz	He moved a bit under braking there, I don’t know if that is legal. He completely moved left when I went left.
Albon	Go on! Yes!	Jego	P9 for you Alex P5. Was good to see us fighting another team and another competitor. I know we were expecting to, hoping to, finish better but that was a strong race. A lot of things to learn. Some things to discuss.
Urwin	Makes up for yesterday. Mega P5 today.	Sainz	That’s not how I go racing, guys. I don’t care. I’ve lost a lot of confidence here on everything.
Albon	Yeah sorry about yesterday guys. What a way to come back. Well done.	Vowles	Yeah Carlos noted. We’ll discuss this in the room but I agree with you we need proper engagement on it. For the time being well done for picking up points. You had damage to the car we’ll take you through but well done for recovering as much as possible.
Vowles	Alex, really, really impressive drive. This is just making amends. We’ve got a fast car, we’re moving forward. We win and lose together. Really proud of you today. You were the fastest car on track, I think, for the last few laps, so brilliant, brilliant stint. Well done.	Sainz	Thank you.
Albon	Yep, well done everyone. I don’t know the last time I’ve seen the podium from a full race stick before, so thank you, we’re progressing.

The Miami Grand Prix served as a microcosm of the intense pressures and complex dynamics inherent in Formula 1. While Albon’s performance showcased the team’s potential, Sainz’s frustration highlighted the delicate balance of managing driver expectations, pre-race agreements, and the fast-paced, often unpredictable nature of the race itself. The incident underscores that even for a unified team like Williams, achieving collective success often means navigating individual ambitions and potential miscommunications under the most extreme conditions. Vowles’ concluding remarks about winning and losing together, and acknowledging the need for “proper engagement,” set the stage for crucial discussions within the team, emphasizing that addressing internal conflicts transparently is just as important as on-track performance for long-term success.

Analyzing the Williams Miami Grand Prix Incident: Team Orders, Trust, and the Path Forward

The Miami Grand Prix provided a fascinating, albeit tense, case study in team dynamics within Formula 1. On one hand, Alexander Albon’s stellar drive to P5 was a significant morale booster and a testament to the Williams team’s tangible progress. His ability to maintain pace, manage his tires, and overcome a mid-race water pressure scare demonstrated a maturity and performance level that truly contributed to the team’s best result of the season. His jubilant reaction after the race was entirely justified, reflecting the sheer effort and skill required to achieve such a feat in the highly competitive F1 grid.

Conversely, Carlos Sainz Jnr’s frustration, expressed so vehemently after the race and directly to Team Principal James Vowles, exposes the fragile nature of trust and communication within a racing team. Sainz’s perception that a pre-race agreement had been broken, particularly when he believed Albon had been “instructed” to hold position, clearly undermined his confidence. In Formula 1, where drivers push themselves and their machinery to the absolute limit, every interaction with the pit wall, every perceived instruction, is scrutinized intensely. A feeling of being let down or of inconsistencies in team management can severely impact a driver’s mental state, leading to a loss of “confidence” as Sainz articulated.

The incident involving Albon’s water pressure issue adds a layer of complexity. From a purely strategic and car preservation standpoint, allowing Albon to pass into clear air could be argued as the correct decision, aimed at preventing a potential DNF or significant performance degradation. However, the timing and communication of this decision appear to have been mismanaged from Sainz’s perspective. The gap between what Sainz understood the team’s strategy to be and what actually transpired on track created an undeniable conflict. This highlights the critical importance of crystal-clear communication and ensuring that both drivers are fully aligned with, and understand the rationale behind, any tactical changes, especially those involving inter-team positioning.

Team orders, while often unpopular with fans, are a necessary tool in Formula 1 for maximizing team points, managing car reliability, or executing strategic plays. The challenge lies in their implementation. When drivers feel that these orders are arbitrary, unfair, or inconsistently applied, it can lead to internal friction that is detrimental to the team’s overall performance and harmony. James Vowles’ quick acknowledgment of Sainz’s concerns and his promise of a thorough discussion are crucial steps in rebuilding that trust. For Williams, as they continue their upward trajectory, ensuring strong team cohesion and transparent communication will be paramount. Lessons from this Miami Grand Prix incident will undoubtedly inform future race strategies and internal protocols, aiming to achieve both individual driver success and collective team triumph without fostering resentment.

Go ad-free for just £1 per month>> Find out more and sign up

2025 Miami Grand Prix

• Nothing for Ferrari to learn from Miami team orders episode – Vasseur
• Hamilton proud of Ferrari as ‘we’re taking a beating from media and people’s comments’
• McLaren legality never in doubt says Piastri as FIA’s post-race check clears car
• Albon did not disobey team orders in Miami says Vowles after Sainz’s complaint
• McLaren score their most emphatic win since Hamilton’s 2008 Silverstone triumph

Browse all 2025 Miami Grand Prix articles