In a pivotal moment for Formula 1, Stefano Domenicali, the sport’s new CEO, recently addressed the media for the first time since taking the helm. His statements offered crucial insights into the future direction of F1, particularly regarding the potential entry of new teams and the highly debated $200 million (£146 million) ‘anti-dilution fee’. Domenicali confirmed that this substantial entry barrier, designed to protect existing constructors, could indeed be waived under specific, yet to be fully defined, circumstances.
Advert | Become a Supporter & go ad-free
Responding to a direct query from RaceFans, Domenicali indicated a willingness to consider waivers in “cases that need to go deeper into the discussion without that money.” This nuanced position suggests a pragmatic approach from the new leadership, recognizing the delicate balance between safeguarding current investments and fostering growth within the sport. The fee itself, which RaceFans first brought to light in September 2019, was implemented as a compensatory measure for the ten established teams. Its purpose is to offset potential revenue losses under Formula 1’s revised financial structure, which now distributes earnings more broadly across all competing teams, rather than exclusively rewarding those who consistently finish in the top ten over a three-year cycle. Should the grid expand beyond ten teams, this new payout model would inevitably dilute individual team earnings – potentially by 9% with eleven teams or by a more significant 16% if the grid were to grow to twelve.
Domenicali, a seasoned figure in motorsport with a distinguished background as Ferrari’s team principal from 2007 to early 2014, staunchly defended the inclusion of this clause within the 2021-2025 Concorde Agreement. This fundamental covenant dictates Formula 1’s commercial and regulatory framework, serving as the bedrock for the sport’s operational and financial stability. He emphasized the painstaking efforts involved in forging an agreement palatable to all stakeholders, underscoring its strategic importance.
“The Concorde Agreement was a massive step because I knew about the difficulties of finding the right agreement that was good for everyone,” Domenicali shared with a select group of media. He elaborated on the rationale behind the figure, stating, “If you look at that amount of money [it] is really the value of the franchise of a team being able to compete. That was the thinking behind it.” This perspective frames F1 teams not merely as racing entities, but as valuable commercial franchises, whose market value is reflected in the entry fee. This approach seeks to elevate the perceived worth and stability of participating in the elite motorsport series.
The anti-dilution fee has undeniably posed a significant hurdle for numerous prospective teams eager to join the Formula 1 grid. Among them is the ambitious Euro-Asian outfit Panthera, whose plans have been notably complicated by this financial requirement. Rather than committing to a one-time payment that would severely strain their cash flow during the critical developmental phase and, perhaps counter-intuitively, indirectly bolster their future competitors, Panthera is actively exploring alternative pathways. Their predicament highlights the double-edged sword of the fee: while it protects existing teams, it also creates a formidable barrier to entry for genuinely interested and viable new participants.
Benjamin Durand, co-founder of Panthera, expressed a cautious optimism following Domenicali’s remarks. “We welcome Stefano’s comments,” Durand told RaceFans, “but we need to understand under which circumstances the fee could be waived. We are currently investigating other options, including investments in existing teams. This could alter that.” This sentiment underscores the urgent need for clarity from F1 leadership regarding the specific criteria for a fee waiver, as the current ambiguity leaves potential entrants in a strategic limbo. Investing in an existing team offers a way around the anti-dilution fee, but presents its own set of challenges, including valuation, control, and integration complexities, potentially reshaping the competitive landscape from within rather than through outright expansion.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Despite the unprecedented challenges presented by the global Covid-19 pandemic, Domenicali revealed a surprising surge of interest in Formula 1. The sport has received a considerable number of new team requests, signaling a robust appetite for involvement even during uncertain economic times. This influx of interest speaks volumes about the enduring allure and perceived commercial viability of Formula 1 on the global stage, attracting attention from diverse quarters.
“We are receiving a lot of interest from OEMs [original equipment manufacturers] who want to understand the future of Formula 1,” Domenicali stated, highlighting the engagement from major automotive players. “We are receiving – it seems strange from outside, but I’m very happy for that – some new requests for teams or other organisations that want to see if there is a possibility to invest in Formula 1.” This enthusiastic response from OEMs and other organizations validates the foundational strategies and forward-thinking ideas currently being implemented by Formula 1 management under Liberty Media. It suggests that the sport’s vision for its future, encompassing technological advancements, commercial growth, and global relevance, resonates strongly with potential investors and automotive giants looking to showcase their capabilities and connect with a vast, engaged audience.
However, Domenicali, who previously served as CEO of Lamborghini and was tasked by its parent VW Group to evaluate an F1 entry, tempered expectations regarding immediate grid expansion. He admitted that the likelihood of any additional teams or engine suppliers joining F1 “within two [or] three years” is low. This cautious timeline is primarily driven by the sweeping new technical regulations poised to take effect after the current season. Major regulatory overhauls typically necessitate significant investment in research, development, and infrastructure, making it impractical for new entrants to join mid-cycle. Consequently, OEMs are more inclined to wait until clearer timelines for subsequent regulation sets are published, currently anticipated for either 2025 or 2026, allowing them to plan their substantial investments strategically and with greater certainty.
The F1 CEO elaborated on the strategy to entice these potential new partners. “We are trying to put in place ideas that will be very attractive for new OEMs to be part of the business,” he explained. A critical component of this strategy involves ensuring that the costs of initial investment, coupled with annual operational budgets, are structured to “make it attractive for any [incoming] OEM to either to produce an engine or to be part of an engine-plus-chassis production.” This highlights a fundamental shift towards making participation economically viable and appealing. The cost factor, therefore, will be the central equation dominating future discussions between Formula 1 and prospective manufacturers, necessitating a careful balance between technological advancement and financial sustainability.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter andgo ad-free
Domenicali specifically pointed out that the engine development area is not currently governed by any cost cap, unlike other parts of the sport, making it a critical focus for aggressive policy implementation. “That area is not [currently governed] by any kind of cost cap, so it’s one area we need to be very aggressive. Once we have more details about the discussions, these will be shared. Of course, we need to keep the attractiveness [of F1] for OEMs.” This aggressive approach to cost control in power unit development is essential to prevent an escalating spending war that could deter new entrants and put immense pressure on existing suppliers, ensuring that Formula 1 remains a cutting-edge but accessible platform for automotive innovation.
Addressing the broader technological future of motorsport, Domenicali expressed a firm belief that full electrification “is not the only way for the [automotive] future.” This stance differentiates Formula 1 from other motorsport series that have fully embraced electric power. Instead, F1 is committed to a sophisticated hybridisation platform designed to offer manufacturers a unique arena to showcase and develop their advanced powertrain technologies. “Therefore, the hybridisation we want to offer for the future must be the right platform on which they can present their product, they can invest and they can use the product they have in the smartest way possible. So, hybrid will be a diversified platform on which they can invest and promote the efficiency also of their power train.” This approach allows OEMs to leverage F1’s global stage to demonstrate the efficiency and performance of their existing and future hybrid technologies, aligning with broader automotive trends that see hybrids as a crucial bridge technology.
Central to F1’s long-term vision is the commitment to carbon neutrality. “Carbon neutrality is the other element that is at the centre of our discussion,” Domenicali affirmed. The exploration and implementation of eco-fuels and organic fuels are paramount to achieving this ambitious environmental goal. Crucially, Domenicali highlighted a strong consensus among all current engine suppliers and teams regarding this sustainable direction. “And the good thing is that all the [current engine suppliers], all the [current] teams, share this view together.” This collective commitment to sustainability is vital for the sport’s credibility and its ability to attract environmentally conscious partners and fans. “I’m positive that we are attacking the right points, which will be fundamental to keep the interest on our platform also from the technological point of view. We need to ensure that we look ahead in order to keep Formula 1 as the pinnacle of motorsport, as we always said, in terms of technological challenges.” F1’s aspiration is not just to be fast, but to be a leader in sustainable, high-performance technology.
The impending departure of engine supplier Honda at the end of the year, citing the prohibitive costs associated with electrification, poses an immediate and significant challenge to the sport. This exit leaves only three engine suppliers – Mercedes, Ferrari, and Renault – to power the current 20-car grid. The reduced number of suppliers creates a precarious situation, particularly for teams like Red Bull Racing and AlphaTauri, who currently rely on Honda power units. To mitigate this looming crisis, both Red Bull teams are urgently advocating for the sport to adopt an engine freeze. The energy drink company, while a formidable competitor on track, lacks the specialized expertise and vast budgets required to independently develop and maintain these highly complex F1 power units. Hence, their call for a freeze would allow them to continue using the current Honda engines without the burden of ongoing development costs, preserving their competitiveness in the short to medium term.
As meticulously outlined in RaceFans’ recent analysis of F1’s current power unit wrangle, a crucial Formula 1 Commission meeting is scheduled for February 11th. This will be Domenicali’s inaugural meeting in his new capacity, though his prior experience as Ferrari’s delegate provides him with invaluable familiarity. The summit, involving the FIA, Formula 1 management, and all participating teams, is set to address an extensive agenda, with the engine freeze proposal being a top priority. Given the breadth of items to be discussed, ranging from technical regulations to commercial agreements and sustainability initiatives, the outcomes of this meeting will undoubtedly prove critical in shaping Formula 1’s future across the short, medium, and long terms, defining its stability, competitive balance, and strategic direction for years to come.
Join the RaceFans Supporters Drive!
If you’ve enjoyed RaceFans’ motor sport coverage during 2020, please take a moment to find out more about our Supporter Drive.
We’re aiming to welcome 3,000 new Supporters to help fund RaceFans so we can continue to produce quality, original, independent motorsport coverage. Here’s what we’re asking for and why – and how you can sign up:
- Join the RaceFans Supporters Drive!
2021 F1 season
- Masi ‘basically gifted the championship’ to Verstappen says 2021 FIA steward Sullivan
- Las Vegas race backers looking to extend F1 deal beyond 2025
- Why Mercedes put ‘a reminder of joy and pain’ on display in their factory lobby
- Verdict on error in GT race suggests Mercedes would have lost 2021 Abu Dhabi GP appeal
- Title ‘stolen’ from Mercedes made us ‘underdogs people cheer for’ – Wolff
Browse all 2021 F1 season articles